Fake Moon Landing: Evidence, Flags & Remnants | Part 1-3

  • Thread starter Thread starter sneez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Moon landing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the claims of a faked moon landing, exploring evidence presented by conspiracy theorists and the possibility of using telescopes to view artifacts left on the moon, such as the U.S. flags and landing modules. The conversation includes references to videos and previous discussions on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the possibility of telescopes resolving the U.S. flags or remnants of the landing module on the moon as definitive proof of the moon landing.
  • Another participant mentions a planned NASA mission to take close-up photos of the landing site but expresses skepticism about the concept of "ultimate proof" due to the potential for counterarguments regarding government deception.
  • Several participants assert that the evidence presented by conspiracy theorists is flawed or misleading, with one stating that the moon landings are a significant engineering achievement that should not be doubted.
  • One participant expresses strong offense at the suggestion that the moon landings were faked, labeling the conspiracy theories as baseless and previously debunked.
  • A later reply dismisses the claims of evidence for a faked moon landing as financially motivated and suggests that proponents of such theories are aware of their inaccuracies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express significant disagreement regarding the validity of the moon landing conspiracy theories. While some assert that the moon landings are irrefutable, others argue that there is evidence suggesting they were staged. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are references to previous discussions and evidence that have been presented in the past, but specific details about the evidence or the nature of the debunking are not provided in this thread.

sneez
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
part 1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1913474363747128107
part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5737681932896358451
part 3

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561

now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...

my question appart can you dispute that evidence is: is there a possibility of telescope being able to see the U.S flags on the moon? That would be ultimate proof of the landing on the moon. Maybe the remnants of landing module would be more suitable object to view. is it possilble?

is there any such photos?

thanx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Telescopes aren't capable of resolving such small things at such tremendous distances. There was some mission planned by NASA however that, as one of its tasks, was to take up close up photos of the landing sight in a fly-by. It was suppose to happen this year or something, i forget what it was.

Also, i don't see how that could be "ultimate proof". The problem with such "proof" would be that the theory says the government lied and the proof against it could be easily countered by "the government is lying again". I think the ultimate proof is the fact that the evidence presented by conspiracy theorists is usually flat out wrong or the type that completely misses the point or tries to convince naive people of certain "problems" based on our everyday experience. Such an experience of course, doesn't accure inside a vacuum.
 
sneez said:
now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...

First of all, this should be in the "Debunking" area. This has been covered several times before.

Second: I find it VERY offensive that anyone could think that the Moon landings were faked. This is the single greatest engineering feat of the 20th century, and yet some people which have little to no engineering knowledge think they can "prove" it never happened. All of the supposed "proof" of a conspiracy is total B.S., and has been disproved MANY times.

The fact is we landed on the moon, a great triumph for the United States (and mankind), and there is a huge amount of irrevocable evidence that it happened.

sneez said:
my question appart can you dispute that evidence

I won't even dignify this with an answer. All I will say is that I guarantee any and all "evidence" provided in the videos can be completely blown away. The videos are two hours of total crud.
 
Last edited:
ups sorry, question answered thank you all ...
 
sneez said:
now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...
No, they don't. Maybe they think they have evidence, but I'd even venture to say that most such guys know they are full of crap but just spew it for the sake of making money. Most of this comes from a guy named Hoagland, who has spent enough time on it that he can't have completely ignored the debunking of his crap. He has to know he's wrong unless he is actually mentally ill.

Question answered by Penguino, thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Moon Landing: What Flag & Part Was Used?
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 242)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
What Pop Culture Trivia Was Discussed in PF Quiz #1?
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 257)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K