Far off resonant Rabi oscillations in a 2 level system

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillations Resonant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of Rabi oscillations in a two-level quantum system influenced by a time-varying electric field. The Hamiltonian used is defined as $$2\pi\times\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -\Omega\cos(2\pi\omega t) \\ -\Omega\cos(2\pi\omega t) & \Delta \end{pmatrix}$$ with parameters set to ##\Delta = 15,000## MHz, ##\Omega = 10,000## MHz, and ##\omega = 35## MHz. A significant observation is that a minor change in the Rabi frequency from ##10,000## MHz to ##10,001## MHz results in a drastic population change from approximately ##0.6925## to ##0.4847##, while switching from a cosine to a sine function in the Hamiltonian yields negligible differences in population transfer. This indicates a strong sensitivity of population dynamics to the form of the driving field in off-resonant conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically two-level systems.
  • Familiarity with the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE).
  • Knowledge of Rabi oscillations and their mathematical representation.
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of off-resonant Rabi oscillations in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the differences between cosine and sine driving fields in quantum systems.
  • Learn about numerical methods for solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
  • Investigate the effects of varying Rabi frequencies on population dynamics in two-level systems.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students studying two-level systems and Rabi oscillations will benefit from this discussion.

Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! I have a simple 2 level system with the energy difference between the 2 levels, ##\Delta## and I applying a time varying electric field, transferring population from the ground level (initially populated), to the excited level (initially with zero population). The simple Hamiltonian for this is:

$$
2\pi\times\begin{pmatrix}
0 & -\Omega\cos(2\pi\omega t) \\
-\Omega\cos(2\pi\omega t) & \Delta
\end{pmatrix}
$$
where, in my case, the Rabi frequency of the field ##\Omega## is comparable to the energy difference between the 2 levels, ##\Delta##, but ##\omega \ll \Delta, \Omega##. So I am very off-resonant, but I have a lot of power in my field.

For some specific values relevant to my problem, I will assume: ##\Delta = 15,000## MHz, ##\Omega = 10,000## MHz, ##\omega = 35## MHz. Here is my question. When I solve the time dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) with this Hamiltonian, for 1 second (I see this effect in general for other times, too), I get a population in the ground state at the end of: ##0.6924873010111454##. If I do the same, but I change ##\Omega## from ##10,000## to ##10,001## I get instead ##0.4847252419701252##, which is a huge difference for a change in the electric field of only ##1/10,000##.

However, if I do the same thing but I use ##\sin(2\pi\omega t)## instead of ##\cos(2\pi\omega t)## in the Hamiltonian, the population goes from ##0.9994980316477893## to ##0.9994977756145095##. I tried other times, too, to check if this holds, true and it seems to be the case i.e. when using ##cos## the population transfer changes a lot for small changes in the electric field, relative to the ##sin## case. Is this effect real (I can't find any mistake in my code and I don't think I am missing any physics, as it's such a simple 2 level system)? And if so, why do I have this huge difference in behavior?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K