I Faraday cage made of a real conductor

AI Thread Summary
A Faraday cage made of a perfect conductor theoretically results in a zero electric field inside, but real conductors like copper may not block all electromagnetic radiation, particularly at very high or low frequencies. The effectiveness of a Faraday cage can be compromised by seams and access points, such as doors and cable entries, which require careful design and conductive gasketing for proper sealing. Improving the design involves ensuring high contact pressure at sealing points to prevent corrosion and considering the skin effect and waveguide phenomena that impact shielding effectiveness. Grounding may also play a role in enhancing performance. Understanding these factors is crucial for meeting electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) requirements in electronic equipment.
cuallito
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
A faraday cage made of a perfect conductor would theoretically have a zero E field inside.

However, are there cases where a faraday cage made of a real conductor like copper wouldn't block out all EM radiation, like very high or low frequencies? How can the design be improved to make a real faraday cage work more closely to an ideal one? Grounding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depending on the application (size, frequencies involved, etc.), the biggest issue with shielded enclosures is seams (like along doorway edges) and entries for cables (like power, Ethernet data, etc.). Welding up a shielded box is not that hard, but putting doors and access ports on it can be challenging.

One of the things you do with doors and similar access ports is to use conductive gasketing to seal the door to the frame. Such gasketing must have many points of contact between the surfaces, and have high contact pressure at those contact points to prevent corrosion.

More info about typical shielded enclosures and rooms here:

https://www.ets-lindgren.com/products/shielding?page=Products-Landing-Page

https://www.ets-lindgren.com/support/articles-whitepapers?page=Articles-WhitePapers-Page

1666274874554.png
 
cuallito said:
However, are there cases where a faraday cage made of a real conductor like copper wouldn't block out all EM radiation, like very high or low frequencies?
It will depend upon frequency and conductivity. This is in most textbooks.
 
cuallito said:
A faraday cage made of a perfect conductor would theoretically have a zero E field inside.

However, are there cases where a faraday cage made of a real conductor like copper wouldn't block out all EM radiation, like very high or low frequencies? How can the design be improved to make a real faraday cage work more closely to an ideal one? Grounding?
There's lots of stuff on the web about this. It's a big issue for the EMC requirements of electronic equipment.

Here are a couple of things you can look into to learn more about shielding effectiveness:

- Skin effect; the effect of limited conductivity of the shield material.
- "Waveguide beyond cutoff"; the effect of openings and seams in the enclosure.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top