Faraday's Law - loop turning in the Earth's B-field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Faraday's Law in the context of a loop turning in the Earth's magnetic field. Participants are examining the correct interpretation of angles and the evaluation of integrals related to magnetic flux through the loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correctness of equations related to magnetic flux and the integration limits. There are discussions about the treatment of angles and the implications for the integral evaluation. Some participants are exploring the relationship between the area vector and the magnetic field direction.

Discussion Status

There is an active exchange of ideas, with participants providing clarifications and insights into the integration process. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the integral and the significance of the angles involved, while others are still seeking clarity on specific points.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of variables and the setup of the problem, particularly concerning the angles of the coil relative to the magnetic field. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a complete step-by-step solution, which has not yet been fully articulated.

Taulant Sholla
Messages
96
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


prob stmt.png


Homework Equations


Faraday's Law, Ohm's Law, definition of current[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


We were given this solution:[/B]
soln.png

The above solution is leaving out a lot of intermediary steps. I don't agree that "the axis of the coil is at 20°, not 70°, from the magnetic field of the Earth." Technically, the coil's surface normal starts at an angle of θi=(90+70)=160°, and ends-up at θf=(90-70)=20° I want to produce a totally complete, step-by-step solution. Here's how I'm starting...
qw2a.jpg

qax1.jpg

I'm not sure how to proceed after #7. How do I evaluate the integral (not sure how to deal with dA as the integration variable with cosθ sitting there??

Any help is appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • prob stmt.png
    prob stmt.png
    48.5 KB · Views: 824
  • soln.png
    soln.png
    19.5 KB · Views: 870
  • qw2a.jpg
    qw2a.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 457
  • qw2b.jpg
    qw2b.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 509
  • qa1a.jpg
    qa1a.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 519
  • qax1.jpg
    qax1.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 500
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing I see is that eq. 5 is not correct. dΦ ≠ d(B⋅dA). You missed something in eq. 6 WRT dA. WRT eq 7 reconsider your integration limits.
 
The flux integral should be taken over the entire area of the loop at a given instant in time. In particular, ## \theta_i ## and ## \theta_f ## are not bounds for the inner (flux) integral--in fact, they're bounds for the outer (time) integral, since ## \theta ## is a function of time.

This actually simplifies things quite a bit, because as far as the inner integral is concerned, ## \theta ## is a constant--meaning that factor of ## \cos(\theta) ## can essentially be ignored when evaluating the integral. The expression $$ \int \cos(\theta) dA $$ then simply becomes ## A \cos(\theta) ##, where ## A ## is the total area of the loop.

I actually like the way you've written the expression in 7 quite a bit, although I haven't seen it this way before. Using this notation, we have: $$ \frac{-NB}{R} \int_{\theta_i}^{\theta_f} d (A \cos(\theta)) = \left( \frac{-NB}{R} \right) A (\cos(\theta_f) - \cos(\theta_i)) $$ Note that this is identical to the expression given in the solution, except for your minor disagreement about the values of ## \theta_i ## and ## \theta_f ##. I'll let you think about why that distinction actually doesn't matter in the end.
 
Thanks for your help!

"The first thing I see is that eq. 5 is not correct. dΦ ≠ d(B⋅dA). "
Since Φ Ξ ∫B⋅dA, doesn't dΦ = d[∫B⋅dA] = d∫B(dA)cosθ?

"You missed something in eq. 6 WRT dA."
∫dAcosθ = A∫cosθ ? If so, is the integration variable dθ, and if so -- how does this come about?

"WRT eq 7 reconsider your integration limits."
Does the angle but the surface normal and the B-field not begin at 160° and end at 20°?

Thanks again for your help!
 
Very helpful (and educational!). Thank you so much!

VKint said:
The flux integral should be taken over the entire area of the loop at a given instant in time. In particular, ## \theta_i ## and ## \theta_f ## are not bounds for the inner (flux) integral--in fact, they're bounds for the outer (time) integral, since ## \theta ## is a function of time.

This actually simplifies things quite a bit, because as far as the inner integral is concerned, ## \theta ## is a constant--meaning that factor of ## \cos(\theta) ## can essentially be ignored when evaluating the integral. The expression $$ \int \cos(\theta) dA $$ then simply becomes ## A \cos(\theta) ##, where ## A ## is the total area of the loop.

I actually like the way you've written the expression in 7 quite a bit, although I haven't seen it this way before. Using this notation, we have: $$ \frac{-NB}{R} \int_{\theta_i}^{\theta_f} d (A \cos(\theta)) = \left( \frac{-NB}{R} \right) A (\cos(\theta_f) - \cos(\theta_i)) $$ Note that this is identical to the expression given in the solution, except for your minor disagreement about the values of ## \theta_i ## and ## \theta_f ##. I'll let you think about why that distinction actually doesn't matter in the end.
 
Taulant Sholla said:
Very helpful (and educational!). Thank you so much!
 
One last question... in your last equation, how do you know to do d(cosθ)=Δcosθ rather than d(cosθ) = -sinθ ?
 
This is more or less notational. In the context of an integral, "d" doesn't really translate to "take a derivative"--think of it more as a label for the variable of integration. In particular, anytime you see an expression like this: $$ \int_a^b d[ \textrm{stuff} ] $$ the answer is always $$ \left. \textrm{stuff} \right]_a^b = \textrm{stuff}(b) - \textrm{stuff}(a). $$ For example, ## \int_a^b dx = b - a ##, despite the fact that "dx," interpreted as "the derivative of x," would just be a constant.
 
Taulant Sholla said:
Since Φ Ξ ∫B⋅dA, doesn't dΦ = d[∫B⋅dA] = d∫B(dA)cosθ?

remember that in B⋅dA we are interested in the projected area in the direction of B, This projected area depends on the angel of B wrt dA and not dA itself. so
dΦ = ∫ dBdA +∫B⋅d(dA ) = ∫AΘ B⋅dAd(cosΘ) = A∫ΘsinΘdΘ which take care of eq 6 where you did not have an increment in the angle (dΘ) over which to integrate.

Taulant Sholla said:
Does the angle but the surface normal and the B-field not begin at 160° and end at 20°?

Yes you are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Taulant Sholla
  • #10
gleem said:
remember that in B⋅dA we are interested in the projected area in the direction of B, This projected area depends on the angel of B wrt dA and not dA itself. so
dΦ = ∫ dBdA +∫B⋅d(dA ) = ∫AΘ B⋅dAd(cosΘ) = A∫ΘsinΘdΘ which take care of eq 6 where you did not have an increment in the angle (dΘ) over which to integrate.
Yes you are correct.
Thanks a bunch - this really gives me a lot of insight I did't really have before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K