Graduate FEM basis polynomial order and the differential equation order

Click For Summary
Choosing the order of polynomial basis in Finite Element Method (FEM) should align with the local differentiability of the solution, which can be challenging to determine in advance. For a second-order differential equation like the Helmholtz equation, a linear basis function may suffice if the solution is locally linear, while higher-order functions can enhance accuracy for infinitely differentiable solutions. Increasing the polynomial degree generally leads to faster convergence compared to merely increasing the number of cells. In scenarios with shock waves, a mixed approach using lower degree functions near shocks and higher degrees away can be effective. For further insights, resources like "Spectral h/p methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics" and "The Finite Element Method and its Reliability" are recommended.
chowdhury
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
Is there a good rubric on how to choose the order of polynomial basis in an Finite element method, let's say generic FEM, and the order of the differential equation? For example, I have the following equation to be solved
## \frac{\partial }{\partial x} \left ( \epsilon \frac{\partial u_{x} }{\partial x} \right ) + \omega^2 u_{x} = 0 ##

This is second order equation in ##u_{x}##. Which order polynomial basis shall I choose?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The degree of the polynomial basis function is connected to the local differentiability of your solution, this makes the degree difficult to determine beforehand.
Suppose your solution is locally linear. Then using a linear basis function would capture this behavior. You could still use basis functions of higher order, but they will not give you additional accuracy. Your Helmholtz equation above is infinitely differentiable, so you could use very high order basis functions and still see a benefit from the increase in polynomial degree. Increasing the degree of the basis function leads to faster convergence than increasing the number of cells (as function of degrees of freedom). So in general, the best strategy is to increase locally the degree of the basis function until the degree of the local solution (so the degree of the Hilbert space of the local solution). In case of shock waves, you can locally use a low degree basis function, and away from the shock a higher degree basis function.

A very practical book explaining this in detail is "Spectral h/p methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics" by Sherwin and Karniadakis. A more mathematical book is "The Finite Element Method and its Reliability" by Babuska and Strouboulis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
928
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K