Fermion creation and annihilation operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of fermion creation and annihilation operators, denoted as c and c^\dagger. Key relationships established include the anticommutation relations: cc^\dagger + c^\dagger c = 1, cc = 0, and c^\dagger c^\dagger = 0. The participants clarify that while it may seem that [c^\dagger, c] = -1, the correct interpretation involves recognizing that the commutator [c^\dagger, c] leads to a more complex relationship, specifically [c^\dagger, c]c = -c, due to the nilpotent nature of the operators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operator algebra
  • Familiarity with fermionic statistics and anticommutation relations
  • Knowledge of commutators and their properties in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of nilpotent operators and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics, focusing on operator theory
  • Explore the implications of nilpotent operators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of fermionic operators in many-body physics
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as the algebra of observables
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as students and researchers interested in the mathematical formalism of fermionic systems.

daudaudaudau
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Hi.

If [itex]c[/itex] and [itex]c^\dagger[/itex] are fermion annihilation and creation operators, respectively, we know that [itex]cc^\dagger+c^\dagger c=1[/itex] and [itex]cc=0[/itex] and [itex]c^\dagger c^\dagger=0[/itex]. I can use this to show the following
[tex] [c^\dagger c,c]=c^\dagger cc-c c^\dagger c=-cc^\dagger c=-c(1-cc^\dagger)=-c[/tex]

But on the other hand I have
[tex] [c^\dagger c,c]=c^\dagger[c,c]+[c^\dagger,c]c=[c^\dagger,c]c[/tex]

Does this not imply that [itex][c^\dagger,c]=-1[/itex] and consequently that BOTH the commutator and anti-commutator of [itex]c[/itex] and [itex]c^\dagger[/itex] is equal to unity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it does not imply that. Namely, the commutator is:

[tex][c^\dag , c] = c^\dag c - cc^\dag = c^\dag c - 1 + c^\dag c = 2c^\dag c - 1[/tex]

As you can see, the first term gives zero when you act with this commutator on the operator [tex]c[/tex]. In other words,

[tex][c^\dag , c]c = (2c^\dag c - 1)c = -c[/tex]

Which is your result. But for operators you cannot use that if AB = CB, then C = A. The reason is that the operator B is not always invertible (as in this case), but is nilpotent instead. So you have to be careful with these types of manipulations.
 
I see. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
854
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K