Fermion Current Commutators in 2 dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the calculation of equal time commutators for fermionic currents in two-dimensional quantum field theory. The current is defined as J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x) = \overline{\psi_{L}}(t,x + \epsilon) \gamma^{0} \psi_{L}(t,x - \epsilon), where \psi_{L} = \frac{1}{2} (1 - \gamma^{5}) \psi_{D}. The user successfully derives the expression for the commutator [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,y)] and evaluates it in the massless case, ultimately questioning the limit as ε approaches 0. The final result indicates that the commutator approaches zero, confirming the expected behavior of fermionic operators in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory principles, particularly fermionic fields.
  • Familiarity with canonical equal time commutation relations for fermions.
  • Knowledge of Dirac matrices and their role in fermionic currents.
  • Experience with delta functions and their properties in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the canonical equal time commutation relations in quantum field theory.
  • Explore the implications of the massless limit in quantum field theories, particularly for fermionic fields.
  • Learn about the role of delta functions in quantum mechanics and their applications in field theory.
  • Investigate the properties of fermionic operators and their commutation relations in various dimensions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, particularly those focusing on fermionic fields and their commutation relations. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of current operators in two-dimensional quantum systems.

EoinBrennan
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the current: J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x) = \overline{\psi_{L}}(t,x + \epsilon) \gamma^{0} \psi_{L}(t,x - \epsilon) = \psi_{L}^{\dagger} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L}(x - \epsilon) with \psi_{L} = \frac{1}{2} (1 - \gamma^{5}) \psi_{D}.

Use the canonical equal time commutation relations for fermions to compute the equal time commutator:
[J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)].

Homework Equations



Canonical equal time commutation relations:

\{\psi_{a} (x), \psi^{\dagger}_{b} (y)\} = i \delta^{3} (x - y) \delta_{a b}

\{\psi_{a} (x), \psi_{b} (y)\} = \{\psi^{\dagger}_{a} (x), \psi^{\dagger}_{b} (y)\} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



So [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] = \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

From here I'm not sure what path to take.

\{ \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon), \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \} = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \\ \Rightarrow \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( y + \epsilon) = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

Subbing this into the commutation relation gives

i.e. [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] = \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

With \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) = \frac{1}{2} \{ \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon), \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \} = 0, etc.

So now I have

[J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] = \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \\ = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

Is this all correct?

Homework Statement



I am then asked to evaluate \langle 0 \vert [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle in the massless case, and the limit as \epsilon \rightarrow 0.

Homework Equations



I am given that \langle 0 \vert \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (t,x) \psi_{L} (t,y) \vert 0 \rangle = \frac{1}{x - y}.

The Attempt at a Solution



So \langle 0 \vert [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle = \langle 0 \vert i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \vert 0 \rangle \\ = \langle 0 \vert i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) \vert \rangle - \langle 0 \vert i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \vert 0 \rangle

I'm not quite sure how operators like \langle 0 \vert act on the \delta terms.

But it seems like the answer will be:

\langle 0 \vert [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \frac{1}{x - y -2 \epsilon} - i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \frac{1}{y - x + 2 \epsilon}

As \epsilon \rightarrow 0 we get: \langle 0 \vert [J^{0}_{0} (t,x), J^{0}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle = i \delta^{3} (x - y) \frac{1}{x - y} - i \delta^{3} (y - x) \frac{1}{y - x}.

Is this = 0?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. I have very little support from my lecturer and I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by Quantum Field Theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bumping this as it is the exact question I posted yesterday.
 
Bump
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K