Undergrad How Does Zero Characteristic Influence the Structure of Prime Subfields?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Every field of zero characteristic has a prime subfield isomorphic to ℚ. The proof involves defining a homomorphism h: ℚ → P, where h(a/b) = (a*1)(b*1)-1, with a*1 representing the sum of 1 added a times. The multiplicative rule for this homomorphism has been established, while the additive rule requires further proof. The notation (a*1)(b*1)-1 signifies the inverse of the product of the sums representing integers a and b in the prime field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field theory and characteristics of fields
  • Familiarity with homomorphisms in algebra
  • Knowledge of additive and multiplicative structures in fields
  • Basic concepts of commutative algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fields with zero characteristic
  • Learn about homomorphisms and their applications in field theory
  • Investigate the structure of prime fields and their isomorphisms
  • Explore the additive and multiplicative rules in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying field theory, particularly those interested in the properties of prime subfields and homomorphisms.

Danijel
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I am interested in the following theorem:
Every field of zero characteristics has a prime subfield isomorphic to ℚ.
I am following the usual proof, where we identify every p∈ℚ as a/b , a∈ℤ,beℕ, and define h:ℚ→P as h(a/b)=(a*1)(b*1)-1 (where a*1=1+1+1... a times) I have worked out the multiplicative rule for this homomorphism, but I am not sure how to prove the additive. I am also interested in what does the notation
(a*1)(b*1)-1 exactly mean. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Danijel said:
I am interested in the following theorem:
Every field of zero characteristics has a prime subfield isomorphic to ℚ.
I am following the usual proof, where we identify every p∈ℚ as a/b , a∈ℤ,beℕ, and define h:ℚ→P as h(a/b)=(a*1)(b*1)-1 (where a*1=1+1+1... a times) I have worked out the multiplicative rule for this homomorphism, but I am not sure how to prove the additive. I am also interested in what does the notation
(a*1)(b*1)-1 exactly mean. Thanks.
All we know about the prime field is its characteristic and ##0,1 \in \mathbb{P}##. ##a\in \mathbb{P}## is not sure. However ##\underbrace{1+\ldots +1}_{a \text{ times}}=a \,\cdot \, 1## for ##a \in \mathbb{N}## is, and likewise for negative ##a##. That's why ##a## times ##1## is used instead of ##a##. We only have isomorphic images of ##a## in ##\mathbb{P}##.

For the homomorphism, I guess ##\dfrac{a}{b}+\dfrac{c}{d}=\dfrac{ad+bc}{bd}## will be needed.
 
this probably won't help much until you have some commutative algebra but it gives the outline. First of all since the field F is an abelian group, there is exactly one additive homomorphism from the integers Z into F for each choice of the image of 1 from Z, so choose that image to be the unit element 1 in P. Now you have the unique additive homomorphism from Z to P that fresh described sending each positive integer n to 1+...+1 (n times). By definition of the multiplication in Z this is also a multiplicative map hence a ring map. Then since each non zero integer goes to an invertible element of F, (because F has characteristic zero), there is a unique extension of the previously defined ring homomorphism Z-->F to a ring homomorphism Q --> F. Then since Q is a field, this ring map is necessarily injective, hence defines an isomorphism onto the smallest subfield of F, i.e. the prime field.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
977
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
921