MHB Field Theory - Algebrais Extensions - D&F - Section 13.2 - Exercise 4, page 530

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the degree of the field extensions over \(\mathbb{Q}\) for \(2 + \sqrt{3}\) and \(1 + \sqrt[3]{2} + \sqrt[3]{2}\). For \(2 + \sqrt{3}\), it is established that the irreducible polynomial is \(x^2 - 4x + 1\), leading to a degree of 2 for the extension \(\mathbb{Q}(2 + \sqrt{3})\). The participants also discuss the isomorphism between \(\mathbb{Q}[x]/(p(x))\) and \(\mathbb{Q}(2 + \sqrt{3})\), emphasizing that isomorphic vector spaces share the same dimension. Additionally, an alternative approach suggests showing that \(\mathbb{Q}(2 + \sqrt{3}) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3})\). The conversation concludes with a request for confirmation of the correctness of these findings.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Can someone help me get started on the following problem.

Determine the degree over \mathbb{Q} of \ 2 + \sqrt{3} and of 1 + \sqrt[3]{2} + \sqrt[3]{2}

Peter

[This has also been posted on MHF]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's try a naive approach:

Let $u = 2 + \sqrt{3}$. Then $(u - 2)^2 = 3$, so:

$(u - 2)^2 - 3 = 0$.

Multiplying this out, we get:

$u^2 - 4u + 1 = 0$, that is, $u$ is a root of the quadratic polynomial:

$x^2 - 4x + 1$.

If one is willing to accept that $u \not\in \Bbb Q$, this of course means that:

$x^2 - 4x + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$. Can you continue?
 
Deveno said:
Let's try a naive approach:

Let $u = 2 + \sqrt{3}$. Then $(u - 2)^2 = 3$, so:

$(u - 2)^2 - 3 = 0$.

Multiplying this out, we get:

$u^2 - 4u + 1 = 0$, that is, $u$ is a root of the quadratic polynomial:

$x^2 - 4x + 1$.

If one is willing to accept that $u \not\in \Bbb Q$, this of course means that:

$x^2 - 4x + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$. Can you continue?

Thanks Deveno. Sorry for late reply - day job intervened in things!

I followed your post and assume that all we have to do now is quote Theorem 4 of Dummit and Foote section 13.1 which states the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Theorem 4. Let $$ p(x) \in F[x] $$ be an irreducible polynomial of degree n over a field F and let K be the field $$ F[x]/(p(x))$$. Let $$ \theta = x mod(p(x)) \in K $$. Then the elements

$$ 1, \theta, {\theta}^2, ... ... , {\theta}^{n-1} $$

are a basis for K as a vector space over F, so the degree of the extension is n i.e.

$$ [K \ : \ F] = n $$. ... ... ... etc etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In our situation we have

$$ p(x) = x^2 - 4x - 2 $$ where $$ p(x) \in \mathbb{Q}[x] $$.

p(x) has a root u in $$ \mathbb{Q}[x]/(p(x)) $$.

Specifically $$ u = x \ mod(p(x)) \in K = \mathbb{Q}(2 + \sqrt{3}) $$

Then the elements 1 and u are a basis for $$ K = \mathbb{Q}(2 + \sqrt{3})$$.

Thus the degree of the extension $$ \mathbb{Q}(2 + \sqrt{3}) $$ over $$ \mathbb{Q} $$ is 2.

That is [K : F] = 2

Can someone please confirm that the above is correct?

Peter
 
More or less.

You have to realize that $\Bbb Q[x]/(p(x))$ doesn't EQUAL $\Bbb Q(u)$, but they are ISOMORPHIC.

So you need one small theorem from Linear Algebra:

Isomorphic vector spaces over a common field have the same dimension.

This is what allows us to conclude that $[\Bbb Q(u):\Bbb Q] = \text{deg}(p)$.

It may be instructive to convince yourself that an isomorphism between two extension fields of a base field $F$ that preserves the base field is an $F$-linear map (this will be helpful to you later on when you consider automorphisms of an extension field).

Another approach:

Show that: $\Bbb Q(2 + \sqrt{3}) = \Bbb Q(\sqrt{3})$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K