Fighting for Financial Relief: Surviving COVID Debt

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Covid Debt
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the financial implications of medical bills incurred due to COVID-19, particularly focusing on the legal responsibilities of surviving relatives regarding the debts of deceased patients. Participants explore the nuances of estate responsibility, healthcare costs, and the emotional toll on families dealing with such debts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the legality of health providers claiming debts from the estates of deceased patients, particularly in the context of COVID-related medical bills.
  • One participant highlights a specific case where a surviving spouse is pursued for a significant air ambulance bill, questioning the fairness of such financial burdens.
  • There are differing views on the nature of healthcare costs, with some arguing that healthcare inherently costs money and that expectations for free or unlimited care are unrealistic.
  • Participants discuss the complexities of estate law, noting that the responsibility for debts may depend on various factors, including state laws and the financial arrangements between spouses.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of transparency regarding the costs of medical services, particularly in emergency situations, which can lead to unexpected financial consequences for families.
  • Some participants provide context on the costs associated with air ambulance services, suggesting that while high, they may be justified based on distance and medical needs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the legal and ethical implications of medical debt responsibility for surviving relatives. Multiple competing views remain regarding the fairness of such financial burdens and the expectations surrounding healthcare costs.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in understanding the legal frameworks governing estates and debts, as well as the emotional and financial complexities faced by families dealing with COVID-related medical expenses. Specific state laws and individual circumstances are acknowledged as influencing factors.

kyphysics
Messages
685
Reaction score
445

First They Faced the Virus. Now Come the Medical Bills.​

https://www.yahoo.com/news/first-faced-virus-now-come-120944607.html

Saw this article today. From the wording/descriptions in the article, it's not clear to me whether health providers can legally claim part of the estate of a deceased person to cover COVID bills. There are examples of providers going after them to be sure. But, it doesn't seem clear whether this is legal and/or usually successful. Here is one example from the article:
Rebecca Gale, 64, lost her husband of 25 years, Michael, to Coronavirus last summer. Their insurance fully covered most of the “big stack” of medical bills that she received after his death. But it paid only a small portion of the $50,009 air ambulance bill for his transport between hospitals when his condition was deteriorating.

“I cry every day; this is just another thing that breaks my heart, that on top of losing my husband I have to deal with this,” Gale said.

The family’s health insurance plan limits its coverage of air ambulances to $10,000, and the air ambulance company spent months pursuing an additional $40,009 from her husband's estate. Rebecca Gale retired last year, from a job at an Ohio automotive factory stamping car parts, anticipating she would get to spend more time with her husband. After he died and the bills started to show up, she considered looking for a part-time job to help pay the charges.

Health care companies have discretion over what to do about the debts of deceased patients, sometimes pursuing their estates for reimbursement.

The air ambulance company, PHI Medical, declined to comment on Michael Gale’s bill but said in a statement that it “followed the regulatory requirements” for billing Coronavirus patients. It did cancel the charges, however, after The Times inquired about the bill.
Seems like an absolute nightmare scenario. Your loved one gets COVID. He/she racks up six or seven figures of bills and passes away. You, the surviving relative, get stuck with their debt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disgusting. Thank God I live in New Zealand.
 
kyphysics said:
you can always buy health insurance later if you come upon some major illness

Vanadium 50 said:
And you wonder why your insurance is so expensive and your deductibles are so high.

So who's responsible for this? Turns out you are.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
kyphysics said:
Seems like an absolute nightmare scenario. Your loved one gets COVID. He/she racks up six or seven figures of bills and passes away. You, the surviving relative, get stuck with their debt.
The article says it is "the estate", which means the money that they guy who passed away had, not the surviving relative. If you have money and then go buy something and then die, how is it unreasonable for the seller to try to get paid from your money that you promised toward the purchase?

The way people think about healthcare is bizarre to me. We do all realize healthcare costs money, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and Vanadium 50
russ_watters said:
We do all realize healthcare costs money, right?
We all want three things: we want it free to the patient, we want it unrationed, and we want it the best in the world. We can't have all three, and we can't really even have two. So the solution is to stamp our feet and say "It's not fair! It's not fair!"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444, russ_watters and BillTre
russ_watters said:
The article says it is "the estate", which means the money that they guy who passed away had, not the surviving relative. If you have money and then go buy something and then die, how is it unreasonable for the seller to try to get paid from your money that you promised toward the purchase?

The surviving relative here is the spouse. What is the difference between his estate and her money in this case?

End of life care in the us is a very sticky subject. It can get arbitrarily expensive, and that usually isn't discussed with the patient ahead of time. When they airlifted that guy from one hospital to the next, do you think anyone explained to him or her that the cost would potentially wipe out her retirement, and there was still a good chance he would die? Maybe, but I kind of doubt it. People don't have the chance to make informed decisions, so of course there are going to be hurt feelings
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and BillTre
Office_Shredder said:
What is the difference between his estate and her money in this case?
I think we would need a lawyer. It depends on the state, the will, the nature of the estate, etc. As in example, in many states if the husband and wife each had $30,000 and the only debt was the $50,000, the air ambulance company would get $30,000 from the estate and the wife would keep her $30,000. If the husband had a $50,000 life insurance policy, the wife would get the $50,000. The air ambulance company couldn't touch this. But "many" is not "all".

By the way, $50,000 is not crazy. Or at least it's understandable. The average air ambulance trip is 250 miles (and $50K), so we're talking airplanes to different cities, not a quick helo ride from one end of town to another. I looked up what a private charter would be from Green Bay, Wisconsin to Rochester, Minnesota (home of the Mayo Clinic) right this second, and got a wheels up time of 13:00 for the low, low price of $35,000. If I wait until Wednesday, I can get it for about $11,000.

This is of course not including medical equipment and staff, and these guys always get paid. I'm actually kind of surprised people can stay in business at $50,000/flight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Vanadium 50 said:
I think we would need a lawyer.
The article isn't great. The wording implies that they had separate finances otherwise it wouldn't be an "estate", I would think. But regardless of the exact arrangement, she's apparently on the hook, but doesn't apparently feel like she should be (or maybe it's just NYT doesn't think so?).

Vanadium 50 said:
By the way, $50,000 is not crazy. Or at least it's understandable. The average air ambulance trip is 250 miles (and $50K), so we're talking airplanes to different cities, not a quick helo ride from one end of town to another.
The article isn't great. I'll admit the "air ambulance" bit threw me. The way it is described in the article it does indeed sound like "a quick helo ride from one end of town to another". Why being sick with COVID would warrant a jet transport is a mystery to me.
 
  • #10
Well, the NYT does kind of have an opinion.

russ_watters said:
Why being sick with COVID would warrant a jet transport is a mystery to me.

The average trip is 250 miles. That's probably a bit long for a regular ambulance. Depending on the exact direction of the roads and how air miles translate to land miles, maybe 5 or 6 hours? Plus you need to pay the ambulance to drive back. Even that is six or seven thousands dollars, and you have five or six hours of bumpity-bump-bump-bump. That might not be what you want for the patient.

It's not clear a turboprop wouldn't be adequate, especially considering the end effects.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 203 ·
7
Replies
203
Views
28K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
31K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K