I Final part of proof of timelike Killing w/ Frobenius --> static

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the implications of a timelike Killing vector satisfying the Frobenius condition, leading to the equation that describes its behavior. The solution indicates that the Killing vector can be expressed in terms of a scalar function, allowing for a coordinate transformation that simplifies the metric. The goal is to demonstrate that this transformation results in a metric where certain components vanish, indicating a static nature. The conclusion emphasizes that the resulting timelike congruence in the new coordinates is hypersurface orthogonal. This establishes a critical link between the properties of the Killing vector and the structure of spacetime.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
If ##V## is timelike Killing with Frobenius condition ##V_{[\alpha} \nabla_{\mu} V_{\nu]} = 0## then you can derive the equation:$$\nabla_{\mu} (|V|^2 V_{\nu}) - \nabla_{\nu} (|V|^2 V_{\mu}) = 0$$which has the solution$$V_{\alpha} = \partial_{\alpha} \phi \quad \mathrm{where} \quad \phi = x^0 + f(x^i)$$The final part of the proof is to show that you can use this function to transform the coordinates ##\bar{x} = \bar{x}(x)## such that ##\bar{g}_{0i} = 0## and ##\partial_0 \bar{g}_{\mu \nu} = 0##. I don't see it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
The final part of the proof is to show that you can use this function to transform the coordinates ##\bar{x} = \bar{x}(x)## such that ##\bar{g}_{0i} = 0## and ##\partial_0 \bar{g}_{\mu \nu} = 0##. I don't see it?
I don't know the details of such proof, however the result is that the timelike congruence at rest in such a chart with coordinates ##\bar x## (i.e. the set of timelike worldlines described by fixed spacelike coordinates in this chart) turns out to be hypersurface orthogonal.
 
Last edited:
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...