Find a function from a Recursive Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter loveinla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the function W_{t}^{x} from a recursive formula involving probabilities P_{t}^{x} and expectations. The expectation is clarified to be with respect to the variable θ, which ranges from 0 to 1. A key concern is the lack of a decreasing value for "x" in the recurrence, raising questions about the initial values needed for the function. The problem is identified as a one-armed bandit scenario where θ is a random variable to be determined. The main inquiry is about finding the initial value W^{0}_{0} or W^{x}_{t}.
loveinla
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'd like to solve a function W_{t}^{x} from a recursive formula below.

W_{t}^{x}=P_{t}^{x}*W_{t+1}^{x+1}+(1 - P_{t}^{x})*W_{t+1}^{x},

where P_{t}^{x} = \frac{E[\theta^{x+1}*(1 - \theta)^{t-x}]}{E[\theta^{x}*(1-\theta)^{t-x}]}, {\underset{t\to\infty, x\to 0}{lim}}W_{t}^{x} =0. Here E stands for expectation.

Any suggestions? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
loveinla said:
E stands for expectation.

Expectation with respect to which variable? Over what range of integration?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Expectation with respect to which variable? Over what range of integration?
I'd imagine on the only free variable in the expression for P, namely \theta, and over (-\infty,\infty). But you do well in asking instead of guessing like yours truly. :)

What worries me most is that, in the recurrence rule for W, the "x" does not get any smaller. So what are supposed to be the initial values?
 
dodo said:
I'd imagine on the only free variable in the expression for P, namely \theta, and over (-\infty,\infty). But you do well in asking instead of guessing like yours truly. :)

What worries me most is that, in the recurrence rule for W, the "x" does not get any smaller. So what are supposed to be the initial values?

Thanks, you are right, the expectation is with respect to \theta, which is on [0,1].

The initial value is indeed what I am trying to find.

In fact, it is a one-armed bandit problem with Bernoulli probability \theta, but \theta is a random variable we are trying to figure out through the realization.

Any idea on how to determine the initial value W^{0}_{0} or W^{x}_{t}?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top