Find a function from a Recursive Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter loveinla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Function
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the function W_{t}^{x} from a recursive formula involving probabilities P_{t}^{x} and expectations. The expectation is clarified to be with respect to the variable θ, which ranges from 0 to 1. A key concern is the lack of a decreasing value for "x" in the recurrence, raising questions about the initial values needed for the function. The problem is identified as a one-armed bandit scenario where θ is a random variable to be determined. The main inquiry is about finding the initial value W^{0}_{0} or W^{x}_{t}.
loveinla
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'd like to solve a function W_{t}^{x} from a recursive formula below.

W_{t}^{x}=P_{t}^{x}*W_{t+1}^{x+1}+(1 - P_{t}^{x})*W_{t+1}^{x},

where P_{t}^{x} = \frac{E[\theta^{x+1}*(1 - \theta)^{t-x}]}{E[\theta^{x}*(1-\theta)^{t-x}]}, {\underset{t\to\infty, x\to 0}{lim}}W_{t}^{x} =0. Here E stands for expectation.

Any suggestions? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
loveinla said:
E stands for expectation.

Expectation with respect to which variable? Over what range of integration?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Expectation with respect to which variable? Over what range of integration?
I'd imagine on the only free variable in the expression for P, namely \theta, and over (-\infty,\infty). But you do well in asking instead of guessing like yours truly. :)

What worries me most is that, in the recurrence rule for W, the "x" does not get any smaller. So what are supposed to be the initial values?
 
dodo said:
I'd imagine on the only free variable in the expression for P, namely \theta, and over (-\infty,\infty). But you do well in asking instead of guessing like yours truly. :)

What worries me most is that, in the recurrence rule for W, the "x" does not get any smaller. So what are supposed to be the initial values?

Thanks, you are right, the expectation is with respect to \theta, which is on [0,1].

The initial value is indeed what I am trying to find.

In fact, it is a one-armed bandit problem with Bernoulli probability \theta, but \theta is a random variable we are trying to figure out through the realization.

Any idea on how to determine the initial value W^{0}_{0} or W^{x}_{t}?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K