Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around seeking a patent attorney or agent near Washington, DC, or Baltimore, MD, to assist with filing patents for a new invention. Participants explore various aspects of the patent process, including costs, the roles of patent attorneys versus patent agents, and strategies for approaching potential legal representation.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses a need for a patent attorney willing to work on a profit-sharing basis rather than upfront fees, citing financial constraints.
- Another suggests considering an unemployed or underemployed lawyer, such as a law student, to potentially negotiate favorable terms.
- A participant warns that attorneys who agree to such terms may not prioritize their reputation, raising concerns about safety and reliability.
- It is proposed that a patent agent might be a more cost-effective option, as they are less expensive than attorneys and knowledgeable about the legal process.
- Some participants emphasize the importance of preparing detailed drawings and descriptions of the invention before involving an attorney to save costs.
- Concerns are raised about the practical utility of patents for small companies, particularly regarding the resources needed to defend them in potential legal disputes.
- One participant questions the viability of selling a patent to a large corporation, suggesting that such deals typically favor lump-sum payments rather than ongoing royalties.
- Another participant highlights the necessity for an invention to be significantly different from existing patents to be patentable, referencing the complexities of patent litigation.
- There is a discussion about the potential disconnect between patentability and marketability, with some participants noting that a good product can still be poorly marketed.
- Questions arise about the importance of having a prototype before pursuing patent rights.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions regarding the best approach to securing patent representation, with no clear consensus on the viability of profit-sharing arrangements or the effectiveness of patents for small businesses. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the patent process and strategies for success.
Contextual Notes
Participants acknowledge various limitations, such as the need for significant capital to defend patents and the complexities involved in proving the uniqueness of an invention. There is also an emphasis on the importance of thorough research and preparation before engaging legal assistance.