Find coordinates of f′, f′′, f′′′ in the basis

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Logan Land
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Coordinates
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the coordinates of the derivatives \( f' \), \( f'' \), and \( f''' \) of the polynomial \( f(x) = x^5 - 5x^4 \) in a specified basis. Participants explore methods for determining these coordinates, including the use of Taylor series and matrix representations.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the derivatives \( f' = 5x^4 - 20x^3 \), \( f'' = 20x^3 - 60x^2 \), and \( f''' = 60x^2 - 120x \) and expresses confusion about the next steps to find coordinates in the basis {1, x, x², x³, x⁴, x⁵}.
  • Another participant confirms the coordinate vector for \( f' \) as (0, 0, 0, -20, 5, 0) and asks for the coordinates of \( f'' \) and \( f''' \).
  • Participants discuss the method of using Taylor series coefficients to find coordinates, with one suggesting the use of \( a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(1)}{n!} \) for the new basis {1, (x-1), (x-1)², (x-1)³, (x-1)⁴, (x-1)⁵}.
  • There are calculations for \( a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5 \) based on the derivatives evaluated at \( x = 1 \), leading to coordinates for \( f \) as (-4, -15, -20, -10, 0, 1).
  • Participants express uncertainty about how to derive the coordinates for \( f' \) and \( f'' \) from the coordinates of \( f \) and discuss whether to start with \( f' \) or \( f'' \) as a new base.
  • One participant proposes using a matrix approach to find coordinates but is advised to stick with the Taylor method or binomial expansion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the calculations for the derivatives and their coordinates in the original basis. However, there is some disagreement on the method to use for finding coordinates in the new basis, with some favoring the Taylor series approach while others suggest matrix methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential limitations of their methods, including the dependence on the choice of basis and the need for clarity on the application of Taylor series versus matrix representations.

Logan Land
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Consider the polynomial f(x) = x^5 − 5x^4.

(a) Find coordinates of f′, f′′, f′′′ in the basis {1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5}

I no f ' = 5x^4-20x^3
f " = 20x^3-60x^2
and f "' = 60x^2-120x

but from there where to begin?

do I make a matrix of like the following?

1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 -20
0 0 0 0 1 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 1 0

cause that is already in reduced form.

Just a little confused on where to start after find f ' , f " , and f '''
unless the coordinate vector is just
(0,0,0,-20,5,0) for f ' ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LLand314 said:
unless the coordinate vector is just
(0,0,0,-20,5,0) for f ' ?

Yes, that's right. So how would you write the coordinates of $f''$ and $f'''$, knowing that $f''(x) = 20x^3 - 60x^2$ and $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$?
 
Euge said:
Yes, that's right. So how would you write the coordinates of $f''$ and $f'''$, knowing that $f''(x) = 20x^3 - 60x^2$ and $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$?

f '' = (0,0,-60,20,0,0)?
f ''' = (0,-120,60,0,0,0)?

Hope that's correct

-----------------

If my basis was
{1,(x−1),(x−1)^2,(x−1)^3,(x−1)^4,(x−1)^5}

would I expand the factors and create a matrix with the f, f ' , f '' in the last column and solve to get the coordinates for each f, f ' and f ''?
 
LLand314 said:
f '' = (0,0,-60,20,0,0)?
f ''' = (0,-120,60,0,0,0)?

Hope that's correct

Yes, that's right.

LLand314 said:
If my basis was
{1,(x−1),(x−1)^2,(x−1)^3,(x−1)^4,(x−1)^5}

would I expand the factors and create a matrix with the f, f ' , f '' in the last column and solve to get the coordinates for each f, f ' and f ''?

The coefficients of the Taylor series of $f$ at $x = 1$ are $a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(1)}{n!}$, for all integers $n \ge 0$. Since $f$ is a polynomial of degree 5, $a_n = 0$ for $n > 5$. So the coordinates of $f$ relative to your new basis is $(a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5)$. Find the values of these $a_n$. Apply this method to $f'$ and $f''$ to find their coordinates.
 
Euge said:
Yes, that's right.
The coefficients of the Taylor series of $f$ at $x = 1$ are $a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(1)}{n!}$, for all integers $n \ge 0$. Since $f$ is a polynomial of degree 5, $a_n = 0$ for $n > 5$. So the coordinates of $f$ relative to your new basis is $(a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5)$. Find the values of these $a_n$. Apply this method to $f'$ and $f''$ to find their coordinates.

So my $a_1 = \frac{1^{(1)}(1)}{1!}$ is the answer to this? Sorry that confused me a little. Our teach never mentioned that.
 
The symbol $f^{(n)}$ means the $n$th derivative of $f$. When $n = 0$, $f^{(n)} = f$.
 
Euge said:
The symbol $f^{(n)}$ means the $n$th derivative of $f$. When $n = 0$, $f^{(n)} = f$.

How do I put that into that equation when there's 2 values of x powers, x^5 and x^4 or do I do each separately?
Could I see an example possibility?

Thanks
 
LLand314 said:
How do I put that into that equation when there's 2 values of x powers, x^5 and x^4 or do I do each separately?
Could I see an example possibility?

Thanks

We have

$$a_0 = f(1) = 1 - 5 = -4$$

$$a_1 = f'(1) = 5 - 20 = -15$$

$$a_2 = \frac{f''(2)}{2} = \frac{20 - 60}{2} = -20$$

Since $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$, $f'''(1) = 60 - 120 = -60$ and thus

$$a_3 = \frac{f'''(1)}{6} = -10$$

Can you compute $a_4$ and $a_5$?
 
Euge said:
We have

$$a_0 = f(1) = 1 - 5 = -4$$

$$a_1 = f'(1) = 5 - 20 = -15$$

$$a_2 = \frac{f''(2)}{2} = \frac{20 - 60}{2} = -20$$

Since $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$, $f'''(1) = 60 - 120 = -60$ and thus

$$a_3 = \frac{f'''(1)}{6} = -10$$

Can you compute $a_4$ and $a_5$?

Would a4 be 0? Since we have (120x-120)/24 or 0/24 =0?

And

A5= 120/120 or 1?
 
  • #10
LLand314 said:
Would a4 be 0? Since we have (120x-120)/24 or 0/24 =0?

And

A5= 120/120 or 1?

Yes, $a_4 = 0$ and $a_5 = 1$. So what are the coordinates of $f$?
 
  • #11
Euge said:
Yes, $a_4 = 0$ and $a_5 = 1$. So what are the coordinates of $f$?

(-4,-15,-20,-10,0,1)??
 
  • #12
LLand314 said:
(-4,-15,-20,-10,0,1)??

Excellent! :)
 
  • #13
Euge said:
Excellent! :)

If that's the coordinates for f then how do I get f' and f" coordinates if i used derivatives of f to get f coordinates?
 
  • #14
LLand314 said:
If that's the coordinates for f then how do I get f' and f" coordinates if i used derivatives of f to get f coordinates?

or do I start with f ' as a0 then go from there to obtain the coordinates for f'?

and for f '' start with f '' as a0 then go from there to obtain the coordinates for f ''?
 
  • #15
LLand314 said:
If that's the coordinates for f then how do I get f' and f" coordinates if i used derivatives of f to get f coordinates?

Now you know that

$$f(x) = -4 - 15(x - 1) - 20(x - 1)^2 - 10(x - 1)^3 + (x - 1)^5.$$

Differentiate this equation, using the property $\frac{d}{dx}(x - 1)^n = n(x - 1)^{n-1}$ (which follows from the chain rule):

$$f'(x) = -15 - 40(x - 1) - 30(x - 1)^2 + 5(x - 1)^4.$$

So $(-15, -40, -30, 0, 5, 0)$ make the coordinates for $f'$. Using the same method you can find the coordinates for $f''$.
 
  • #16
Euge said:
Now you know that

$$f(x) = -4 - 15(x - 1) - 20(x - 1)^2 - 10(x - 1)^3 + (x - 1)^5.$$

Differentiate this equation, using the property $\frac{d}{dx}(x - 1)^n = n(x - 1)^{n-1}$ (which follows from the chain rule):

$$f'(x) = -15 - 40(x - 1) - 30(x - 1)^2 + 5(x - 1)^4.$$

So $(-15, -40, -30, 0, 5, 0)$ make the coordinates for $f'$. Using the same method you can find the coordinates for $f''$.
so in this case would f '' be (-40,-60,0,20,0,0)?
 
  • #17
LLand314 said:
so in this case would f '' be (-40,-60,0,20,0,0)?

Correct!
 
  • #18
Euge said:
Correct!

Perfect!

I can see that this is a faster method but would it also work if I expanded the factors into polynomials and put them in matrix form in a 6x7 matrix with column 7 the f(x)=x^5-5x^4 in matrix form?

The only reason I ask is in case its not a taylor series for my basis.
 
  • #19
LLand314 said:
Perfect!

I can see that this is a faster method but would it also work if I expanded the factors into polynomials and put them in matrix form in a 6x7 matrix with column 7 the f(x)=x^5-5x^4 in matrix form?

The only reason I ask is in case its not a taylor series for my basis.

Which factors? You mean the powers of $x - 1$?

I can understand if you wrote the coordinates of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ separately as column vectors (which would give the coordinate matrices of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ relative to your new basis). However, I don't see why you would be put them in a $6\times 7$ matrix.
 
  • #20
Euge said:
Which factors? You mean the powers of $x - 1$?

I can understand if you wrote the coordinates of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ separately as column vectors (which would give the coordinate matrices of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ relative to your new basis). However, I don't see why you would be put them in a $6\times 7$ matrix.

yes the factors of (x-1)^n

as in

1 -1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
for vectors (1, x-1)
and so on...

- - - Updated - - -

View attachment 3441
like this

where each column is the factor expanded into a polynomial and b is the function and them perform row reduction, would that still give the same answers?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-23 at 4.54.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-23 at 4.54.20 PM.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 97
  • #21
LLand314 said:
yes the factors of (x-1)^n

as in

1 -1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
for vectors (1, x-1)
and so on...

- - - Updated - - -

View attachment 3441
like this

where each column is the factor expanded into a polynomial and b is the function and them perform row reduction, would that still give the same answers?

No, you don't want to do that. Stick with the Taylor method or use the binomial theorem with the identity $x = (x - 1) + 1$ to obtain coordinate matrices for $f$, $f'$, and $f''$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
947
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K