MHB Find n such that both n+3 and n^2+3 are perfect cubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding an integer n such that both n+3 and n^2+3 are perfect cubes. It is established that if both expressions are cubes, their product also forms a specific cubic expression. However, it is noted that two consecutive cubes can only be 0 and 1, which is not applicable here since n^2 + 3 is always greater than or equal to 3. The conclusion drawn is that no such integer n exists, making the problem inherently impossible. The phrasing of the question is criticized for suggesting that a solution might be possible when it is not.
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Find n such that both $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are perfect cubes
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kaliprasad said:
Find n such that both $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are perfect cubes

hint

product of 2 cubes is a cube
 
kaliprasad said:
hint

product of 2 cubes is a cube
[sp]So if $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are cubes then so is $(n+3)(n^2+3) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n = (n+1)^3 - 1$. But two consecutive numbers cannot both be cubes unless they are $0$ and $1$. Since $n^2 + 3 \geqslant 3$, the pair $0$ and $1$ cannot arise in this way. Therefore the question is asking for something impossible (which I think is a bit sneaky! (Tongueout) ).[/sp]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
[sp]So if $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are cubes then so is $(n+3)(n^2+3) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n = (n+1)^3 - 1$. But two consecutive numbers cannot both be cubes unless they are $0$ and $1$. Since $n^2 + 3 \geqslant 3$, the pair $0$ and $1$ cannot arise in this way. Therefore the question is asking for something impossible (which I think is a bit sneaky! (Tongueout) ).[/sp]

Sorry Opalg,

product you evaluated is not correct
 
kaliprasad said:
Sorry Opalg,

product you evaluated is not correct
[sp]Oops, yes, of course it should be $(n+3)(n^2+3) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n + 9 = (n+1)^3 + 8$. But the only cubes that differ by $8$ are $0$ and $\pm8$. Since none of those numbers is of the form $n^2+3$, no such $n$ exists.

I still think it is unfair to phrase the question in a way that implies it is possible to find $n$, when in fact it is not possible.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]
I still think it is unfair to phrase the question in a way that implies it is possible to find $n$, when in fact it is not possible.[/sp]

I do not think so. The answer is there is no such n. the set can be empty.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top