MHB Find n such that both n+3 and n^2+3 are perfect cubes

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding an integer n such that both n+3 and n^2+3 are perfect cubes. It is established that if both expressions are cubes, their product also forms a specific cubic expression. However, it is noted that two consecutive cubes can only be 0 and 1, which is not applicable here since n^2 + 3 is always greater than or equal to 3. The conclusion drawn is that no such integer n exists, making the problem inherently impossible. The phrasing of the question is criticized for suggesting that a solution might be possible when it is not.
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Find n such that both $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are perfect cubes
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kaliprasad said:
Find n such that both $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are perfect cubes

hint

product of 2 cubes is a cube
 
kaliprasad said:
hint

product of 2 cubes is a cube
[sp]So if $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are cubes then so is $(n+3)(n^2+3) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n = (n+1)^3 - 1$. But two consecutive numbers cannot both be cubes unless they are $0$ and $1$. Since $n^2 + 3 \geqslant 3$, the pair $0$ and $1$ cannot arise in this way. Therefore the question is asking for something impossible (which I think is a bit sneaky! (Tongueout) ).[/sp]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
[sp]So if $n+3$ and $n^2+3$ are cubes then so is $(n+3)(n^2+3) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n = (n+1)^3 - 1$. But two consecutive numbers cannot both be cubes unless they are $0$ and $1$. Since $n^2 + 3 \geqslant 3$, the pair $0$ and $1$ cannot arise in this way. Therefore the question is asking for something impossible (which I think is a bit sneaky! (Tongueout) ).[/sp]

Sorry Opalg,

product you evaluated is not correct
 
kaliprasad said:
Sorry Opalg,

product you evaluated is not correct
[sp]Oops, yes, of course it should be $(n+3)(n^2+3) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n + 9 = (n+1)^3 + 8$. But the only cubes that differ by $8$ are $0$ and $\pm8$. Since none of those numbers is of the form $n^2+3$, no such $n$ exists.

I still think it is unfair to phrase the question in a way that implies it is possible to find $n$, when in fact it is not possible.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]
I still think it is unfair to phrase the question in a way that implies it is possible to find $n$, when in fact it is not possible.[/sp]

I do not think so. The answer is there is no such n. the set can be empty.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
925
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K