MHB Find P(Q') B) P(Q union R) C) P(R')

  • Thread starter Thread starter chelseajjc95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Union
chelseajjc95
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have this problem with understanding this specific notation could someone explain this notation & figure out how to solve this problem!?

Suppose P(Q)=5/31 , P(R)= 7/31 , P(Q intersect R)=3/31
Find the value of:
A) P(Q') B) P(Q union R) C) P(R')
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
chelseajjc95 said:
I have this problem with understanding this specific notation could someone explain this notation & figure out how to solve this problem!?

Suppose P(Q)=5/31 , P(R)= 7/31 , P(Q intersect R)=3/31
Find the value of:
A) P(Q') B) P(Q union R) C) P(R')

I might be tempted to draw two partially intersecting circles. Call one Q and the other R. Draw a box around them.
 
chelseajjc95 said:
I have this problem with understanding this specific notation could someone explain this notation & figure out how to solve this problem!?

Suppose P(Q)=5/31 , P(R)= 7/31 , P(Q intersect R)=3/31
Find the value of:
A) P(Q') B) P(Q union R) C) P(R')
If you really have no idea what the notations even mean where in the world did you get this question?

(A) Q' is the event that Q does NOT happen.
If the probability that Q happens is P(Q)= 5/31 then the probability that Q does not happen is P(Q')= 1- P(Q)= 1- 5/31= 26/31.

(B) Q union R is the event that either Q or R or both happen. Because it is possible that both Q and R happen (which is "Q intersect R"), if we just added P(Q) and P(R) we would have counted the times when both happen twice. We can fix that by subtracting off one P(Q intersect R). That is P(Q union R)= P(Q)+ P(R)- P(Q intersect R)= 5/31+ 7/31- 3/31= 9/31.

(C) As in (A), R' is the event that "R does NOT happen". P(R')= 1- P(R)= 1- 7/31= 24/31.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top