MHB Find Spring Constant \(k\) & Mass \(m\) for Natural Frequency

AI Thread Summary
The natural frequency of a spring-mass system is initially 2Hz, which corresponds to the equation \(\omega_n = 4\pi = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\). When an additional mass of 1kg is added, the frequency drops to 1Hz, leading to the equation \(\omega_n = 2\pi = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m + 1}}\). By substituting the first equation into the second, it is determined that the mass \(m\) is \(\frac{1}{3}\) kg. Subsequently, the spring constant \(k\) is calculated to be \(\frac{16}{3}\pi^2\). This analysis effectively reconciles the equations to find the values of \(k\) and \(m\).
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The natural frequency of a spring-mass system is found to be 2Hz. When an additional mass of 1kg is added to the original mass \(m\), the natural frequency is reduced to 1Hz. Find the spring constant \(k\) and mass \(m\).

Since the natural frequency is 2Hz, we have that \(\omega_n = 4\pi = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\quad (1)\).

When 1kg is added, we have \(\omega_n = 2\pi = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m + 1}}\quad (2)\).

What I have is equation (1) with unknowns \(\sqrt{k}\) and \(\sqrt{m}\) if I write the equation as \(0 = \sqrt{k} - 4\pi\sqrt{m}\), and equation (2) with unknowns \(\sqrt{k}\) and \(\sqrt{m + 1}\) if I write the equation as \(0 = \sqrt{k} - 2\pi\sqrt{m + 1}\).

How can I reconcile these equations so I have two equations with the same two unknowns which will allow to solve for \(k\) and \(m\)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
The natural frequency of a spring-mass system is found to be 2Hz. When an additional mass of 1kg is added to the original mass \(m\), the natural frequency is reduced to 1Hz. Find the spring constant \(k\) and mass \(m\).

Since the natural frequency is 2Hz, we have that \(\omega_n = 4\pi = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\quad (1)\).

When 1kg is added, we have \(\omega_n = 2\pi = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m + 1}}\quad (2)\).

What I have is equation (1) with unknowns \(\sqrt{k}\) and \(\sqrt{m}\) if I write the equation as \(0 = \sqrt{k} - 4\pi\sqrt{m}\), and equation (2) with unknowns \(\sqrt{k}\) and \(\sqrt{m + 1}\) if I write the equation as \(0 = \sqrt{k} - 2\pi\sqrt{m + 1}\).

How can I reconcile these equations so I have two equations with the same two unknowns which will allow to solve for \(k\) and \(m\)?

To solve for $k$ and $m$ from the equations
$$0 = \sqrt{k} - 4\pi\sqrt{m} \tag 1$$
and $$0 = \sqrt{k} - 2\pi\sqrt{m + 1} \tag 2$$
we could do the following:

$$(1) \Rightarrow \sqrt{k}=4 \pi \sqrt{m}$$

Replacing this at $(2)$ we have the following:

$$0=4 \pi \sqrt{m}-2 \pi \sqrt{m+1} \Rightarrow 2 \pi \sqrt{m+1}=4 \pi\sqrt{m} \Rightarrow \sqrt{m+1}=2\sqrt{m} \Rightarrow \left (\sqrt{m+1} \right )^2=\left (2\sqrt{m} \right )^2 \Rightarrow m+1=4m \Rightarrow 3m=1 \Rightarrow m=\frac{1}{3}$$

Replacing this at the relation $\displaystyle{\sqrt{k}=4 \pi \sqrt{m}}$ we get:

$$\sqrt{k}=4 \pi \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} \Rightarrow \left (\sqrt{k}\right )^2=\left (4 \pi \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\right )^2 \Rightarrow k=\frac{16}{3}\pi^2$$
 
mathmari said:
To solve for $k$ and $m$ from the equations
$$0 = \sqrt{k} - 4\pi\sqrt{m} \tag 1$$
and $$0 = \sqrt{k} - 2\pi\sqrt{m + 1} \tag 2$$
we could do the following:

$$(1) \Rightarrow \sqrt{k}=4 \pi \sqrt{m}$$

Replacing this at $(2)$ we have the following:

$$0=4 \pi \sqrt{m}-2 \pi \sqrt{m+1} \Rightarrow 2 \pi \sqrt{m+1}=4 \pi\sqrt{m} \Rightarrow \sqrt{m+1}=2\sqrt{m} \Rightarrow \left (\sqrt{m+1} \right )^2=\left (2\sqrt{m} \right )^2 \Rightarrow m+1=4m \Rightarrow 3m=1 \Rightarrow m=\frac{1}{3}$$

Replacing this at the relation $\displaystyle{\sqrt{k}=4 \pi \sqrt{m}}$ we get:

$$\sqrt{k}=4 \pi \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} \Rightarrow \left (\sqrt{k}\right )^2=\left (4 \pi \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\right )^2 \Rightarrow k=\frac{16}{3}\pi^2$$

thanks. That was pretty obvious. I was thinking about it all wrong.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top