Find t to Satisfy e^iat=e^ia_0, e^ibt=e^ib_0, e^ibct=e^ic_0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maka89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 1K views
maka89
Messages
66
Reaction score
4
If there is no upper limit on t, can you find a t such that: [itex]e^{iat} = e^{ia_0}[/itex], [itex]e^{ibt} = e^{ib_0}[/itex] and [itex]e^{ibct} = e^{ic_0}[/itex] at the same time?

No matter what a,b and c is, though given a != b , a!=c, b!=c and a!= 0, b!= 0, c!=0

Or maybe rather:
[itex]at=a_0 +k_12\pi[/itex], [itex]bt=b_0 +k_22\pi[/itex] and [itex]ct=c_0 +k_32\pi[/itex], where the k's are integers

I think it seems reasonable that you can, or at least come arbitrarily close to the equations being satisfied... But don't know how to prove it, or if I am right... Any pointers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not in general.

Consider a=2, b=1, a0=0 and b0 = 0.1. Clearly t=kπ solves the first equation, but does not solve or even approximate the second one.

If you require that a,b,c do not have a pair which have a common multiple, there should be approximations to arbitrary precision. In general there won't be an exact solution here either.
 
Not equals, mjc123 ;)

Thanks mfb! Forgot to mention, I assumed a is not a multiple of b etc.
 
maka89 said:
I assumed a is not a multiple of b etc.
That is not general enough.
a=2 and b=3 still lead to a common multiple of 6, and the same result.

If we don't have that case, in general all you get is an approximation.