MHB Find the distance between points C and D if the height of the tree is 4m

Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
So the question is...From point C on the ground level, the angle of elevation to the top of a tree is 30 degrees. From point D, which is closer to the tree, the angle of elevation is measured to be 45 degrees. Find the distance between points C and D if the height of the tree is 4m.

I know triangle 1 has angles 30 degrees, 60 and 90. So the adjacent side is 4*sqrt(3)

I know triangle 2 has angles 45 degrees, 45 and 90. The adjacent side is 2*sqrt(2)

From here I am stuck as I do not know how to find the distance between point C and D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let \(d_C\) be the distance from point C to the tree in meters, and so we may write:

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)=\frac{4}{d_C}\implies d_C=4\cot\left(30^{\circ}\right)=4\sqrt{3}\quad\checkmark$$

Likewise for point D:

$$\tan\left(45^{\circ}\right)=\frac{4}{d_D}\implies d_D=4\cot\left(45^{\circ}\right)=4$$

We should expect that in a 45-45-90 triangle the adjacent and opposite sides are equal. And so the distance \(d\) between the two points is:

$$d=d_C-d_D=?$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top