MHB Find the distance between points C and D if the height of the tree is 4m

AI Thread Summary
To find the distance between points C and D, the height of the tree is given as 4m. From point C, the angle of elevation to the top of the tree is 30 degrees, resulting in a distance \(d_C\) of 4√3 meters. From point D, the angle of elevation is 45 degrees, giving a distance \(d_D\) of 4 meters. The distance between points C and D is calculated by subtracting \(d_D\) from \(d_C\), leading to the formula \(d = d_C - d_D\). The final calculation reveals the distance between the two points.
Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
So the question is...From point C on the ground level, the angle of elevation to the top of a tree is 30 degrees. From point D, which is closer to the tree, the angle of elevation is measured to be 45 degrees. Find the distance between points C and D if the height of the tree is 4m.

I know triangle 1 has angles 30 degrees, 60 and 90. So the adjacent side is 4*sqrt(3)

I know triangle 2 has angles 45 degrees, 45 and 90. The adjacent side is 2*sqrt(2)

From here I am stuck as I do not know how to find the distance between point C and D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let \(d_C\) be the distance from point C to the tree in meters, and so we may write:

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)=\frac{4}{d_C}\implies d_C=4\cot\left(30^{\circ}\right)=4\sqrt{3}\quad\checkmark$$

Likewise for point D:

$$\tan\left(45^{\circ}\right)=\frac{4}{d_D}\implies d_D=4\cot\left(45^{\circ}\right)=4$$

We should expect that in a 45-45-90 triangle the adjacent and opposite sides are equal. And so the distance \(d\) between the two points is:

$$d=d_C-d_D=?$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top