Find the image: F: N * N -> R , F(x) = m^2 + 2n

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KOO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function defined as F: ℕ × ℕ → ℝ, where F(x) = m² + 2n, generates an image based on the values of m and n from the natural numbers. If ℕ includes zero, the image of F is ℕ. However, if ℕ excludes zero, the image is ℕ \ {1, 2, 4}, as there are no pairs (m, n) that yield these values. The discussion clarifies the importance of defining the set of natural numbers and the implications on the function's output.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set notation, particularly ℕ and ℝ
  • Familiarity with functions and their images in mathematics
  • Knowledge of basic algebra, specifically quadratic expressions
  • Concept of set difference in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of quadratic functions and their images
  • Learn about set theory, focusing on natural numbers and their definitions
  • Explore the implications of including or excluding zero in mathematical sets
  • Study the notation and applications of set difference in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of functions defined over natural numbers, particularly in the context of set theory and algebra.

KOO
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
F:N*N -> R, F(x) = m^2 + 2n

I think the answer is N. Am I right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
KOO said:
I think the answer is N. Am I right?

Based on your title, we have that $F:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ ($\mathbb{N}\ast\mathbb{N}$ makes no sense at all) where $F(x) = m^2+2n$ (I assume here that $x=(m,n)$).

Now, depending on who you talk to, $\mathbb{N}$ may or may not include zero (the general consensus from what I've seen is that $0\notin\mathbb{N}$, but there are some professors/authors that include zero in their definition of the natural numbers; hence why I think it's best to clarify this right from the get go); that is, either $\mathbb{N}=\{x\in\mathbb{Z} : x\geq 0\}$ or $\mathbb{N}=\{x\in\mathbb{Z}: x\geq 1\}$.

If $0\in\mathbb{N}$, then $\mathrm{Im}(F)=\mathbb{N}$. If $0\notin\mathbb{N}$, then $\mathrm{Im}(F) = \mathbb{N}\backslash\{1,2,4\}$ since there aren't pairs $(m,n)\in\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}$ such that $m^2+2n=1$, $m^2+2n=2$, or $m^2+2n=4$.

(In $\mathrm{Im}(F)$, note that all the positive odd numbers greater than or equal to 3 are generated by pairs of the form $(1,n)$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$ since $1^2+2n=2n+1$, and all positive even numbers greater than or equal to 6 are generated by pairs of the form $(2,m)$ for $m\in\mathbb{N}$ since $2^2+2m = 2(m+2)$; this is why I can claim that $F(\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}) = \mathbb{N}\backslash\{1,2,4\}$ for $0\notin\mathbb{N}$.)

I hope this makes sense!
 
Chris L T521 said:
Based on your title, we have that $F:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ ($\mathbb{N}\ast\mathbb{N}$ makes no sense at all) where $F(x) = m^2+2n$ (I assume here that $x=(m,n)$).

Now, depending on who you talk to, $\mathbb{N}$ may or may not include zero (the general consensus from what I've seen is that $0\notin\mathbb{N}$, but there are some professors/authors that include zero in their definition of the natural numbers; hence why I think it's best to clarify this right from the get go); that is, either $\mathbb{N}=\{x\in\mathbb{Z} : x\geq 0\}$ or $\mathbb{N}=\{x\in\mathbb{Z}: x\geq 1\}$.

If $0\in\mathbb{N}$, then $\mathrm{Im}(F)=\mathbb{N}$. If $0\notin\mathbb{N}$, then $\mathrm{Im}(F) = \mathbb{N}\backslash\{1,2,4\}$ since there aren't pairs $(m,n)\in\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}$ such that $m^2+2n=1$, $m^2+2n=2$, or $m^2+2n=4$.

(In $\mathrm{Im}(F)$, note that all the positive odd numbers greater than or equal to 3 are generated by pairs of the form $(1,n)$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$ since $1^2+2n=2n+1$, and all positive even numbers greater than or equal to 6 are generated by pairs of the form $(2,m)$ for $m\in\mathbb{N}$ since $2^2+2m = 2(m+2)$; this is why I can claim that $F(\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}) = \mathbb{N}\backslash\{1,2,4\}$ for $0\notin\mathbb{N}$.)

I hope this makes sense!

Actually I had this question on a test and you're right x=(m,n) and we're told N does not include 0.

Anyways what does \ mean?
 
KOO said:
Actually I had this question on a test and you're right x=(m,n) and we're told N does not include 0.

Anyways what does \ mean?

Ah, that's one notation for set difference. I could have also written it as $\mathbb{N}-\{1,2,4\}$.
 
KOO said:
F:N*N -> R, F(x) = m^2 + 2n

I think the answer is N. Am I right?

I just wanted to let you know that I moved this topic from Calculus to Pre-Calculus (this is a better fit) and copied the problem from the title into the body of the first post. It's okay to put the problem in the title when it is short, but we ask that it also be included in the post as well for clarity. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
995
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
551
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K