MHB Find the Inverse of a Vector: Solve for x in Terms of b

  • Thread starter Thread starter OhMyMarkov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Vector
OhMyMarkov
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone!

I've been trying to solve an equation and got to this place: $\sum _{j=1} ^K (x_j - b_j) = 0$ which gives $e^T x = e^T b$. Now I need to solve for $x$ i.e. find $x$ in terms of the b. How can I do that?

Thank you for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OhMyMarkov said:
Hello Everyone!

I've been trying to solve an equation and got to this place: $\sum _{j=1} ^K (x_j - b_j) = 0$ which gives $e^T x = e^T b$. Now I need to solve for $x$ i.e. find $x$ in terms of the b. How can I do that?

Thank you for the help!

Can we have some more context, or perhaps the original problem?

CB
 
Definitely,

The original problem is to find the minimum of the following function: $T(x) = ||y-Ax||^2 + ||x-b||^2$ where the system y = Ax is overdetermined. Of course we already know the closed form solution of the first norm (linear least squares). My question was regarding the second norm. What I want to do is to try to find a closed form solution for the minimum of the second norm, and add the two solutions up. What I did was, similar to the approach of finding the linear least squares solution, differentiate the second norm with respect to $x_j$s and set to zero. I got what is there in my first post, and now I'm stuck there.

Thank you.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
698
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
690
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
849