Find the locus of the points arg((z+1)/(z+2)) = pi

  • Thread starter Thread starter curious__
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi Points
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the locus of points defined by the equation arg((z+1)/(z+2)) = π, which involves complex numbers and their transformations. Participants are exploring the implications of this equation in the context of complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the locus by substituting z as a complex number in the form x + iy and analyzing the resulting conditions. There are questions regarding the correctness of specific equations and interpretations of the transformations involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their calculations and interpretations. Some have confirmed their results using external tools, while others express uncertainty about missing elements in their reasoning. Multiple approaches to the problem are being considered, including the use of bilinear transformations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a discrepancy between participants' findings and a professor's feedback, indicating potential assumptions or definitions that may need clarification. The discussion also touches on the behavior of the function as x approaches infinity.

curious__
Messages
9
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Find the locus of the points arg((z+1)/(z+2)) = pi
Relevant Equations
z = x + iy, realising the fraction of complex numbers, using the arg = pi condition.
I tried the following proof and got -2 < x < -1 and y = 0 but my prof said that there should be something else I am missing. I have no idea what that is. Thank you.

KakaoTalk_20211106_033732521.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your final answer but I don't think I agree with your equation for ##w##. It's not immediately clear to me what you were doing there.
 
FactChecker said:
I agree with your final answer but I don't think I agree with your equation for ##w##. It's not immediately clear to me what you were doing there.
I set z = x + iy for real numbers x and y, and then did the calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
curious__ said:
I set z = x + iy for real numbers x and y, and then did the calculation.
I don't see what's missing.
 
I couldn't find an error or another possibility either. I double-checked with WolframAlpha and it only confirmed the result.
 
All right. I haven't really thought of verifying with Wolfram Alpha. Yes that should confirm, I don't know, just my professor said that and I wasn't sure. Thank you anyways!
 
curious__ said:
I set z = x + iy for real numbers x and y, and then did the calculation.
Of course. Sorry that I did not see that.
You might be interested in another way that I think is simpler:
1) Solve ##w=(z+1)/(z+2)## for ##z##. That gives ##z=(-2w+1)/(w-1)##.
2) Knowing that transformations of this form map straight lines and circles to straight lines and circles, map a few points along the line of arg(##w##)=##\pi## (that is ##w \lt 0##). Include the endpoints of interest to see what line segment or circle arc you get. ( 0 => -1; -1/2 => (2)/(-3/2)=-4/3; -##\infty## => -2)

Transformations ## z => w## of the type ##w=(az+b)/(cz+d)## in the complex plane are called bilinear transformations (Mobius transformations). They have nice properties that make them very convenient to use.
 
Last edited:
Consider when ##x=\pm \infty##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K