Find the locus of the points arg((z+1)/(z+2)) = pi

  • Thread starter Thread starter curious__
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the locus of points defined by the equation arg((z+1)/(z+2)) = π. Participants confirmed that the solution yields -2 < x < -1 and y = 0, but there was uncertainty regarding the completeness of the proof. A suggestion was made to utilize the bilinear transformation w = (z+1)/(z+2) to derive z in terms of w, leading to z = (-2w+1)/(w-1). This approach emphasizes the mapping of straight lines and circles in the complex plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representations (z = x + iy)
  • Familiarity with arguments of complex functions (arg function)
  • Knowledge of bilinear transformations (Mobius transformations)
  • Experience with graphical interpretation of complex mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bilinear transformations in the complex plane
  • Learn how to derive transformations from complex equations
  • Explore the implications of arg(w) = π in complex analysis
  • Investigate graphical methods for visualizing complex mappings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in understanding transformations in the complex plane.

curious__
Messages
9
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Find the locus of the points arg((z+1)/(z+2)) = pi
Relevant Equations
z = x + iy, realising the fraction of complex numbers, using the arg = pi condition.
I tried the following proof and got -2 < x < -1 and y = 0 but my prof said that there should be something else I am missing. I have no idea what that is. Thank you.

KakaoTalk_20211106_033732521.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your final answer but I don't think I agree with your equation for ##w##. It's not immediately clear to me what you were doing there.
 
FactChecker said:
I agree with your final answer but I don't think I agree with your equation for ##w##. It's not immediately clear to me what you were doing there.
I set z = x + iy for real numbers x and y, and then did the calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
curious__ said:
I set z = x + iy for real numbers x and y, and then did the calculation.
I don't see what's missing.
 
I couldn't find an error or another possibility either. I double-checked with WolframAlpha and it only confirmed the result.
 
All right. I haven't really thought of verifying with Wolfram Alpha. Yes that should confirm, I don't know, just my professor said that and I wasn't sure. Thank you anyways!
 
curious__ said:
I set z = x + iy for real numbers x and y, and then did the calculation.
Of course. Sorry that I did not see that.
You might be interested in another way that I think is simpler:
1) Solve ##w=(z+1)/(z+2)## for ##z##. That gives ##z=(-2w+1)/(w-1)##.
2) Knowing that transformations of this form map straight lines and circles to straight lines and circles, map a few points along the line of arg(##w##)=##\pi## (that is ##w \lt 0##). Include the endpoints of interest to see what line segment or circle arc you get. ( 0 => -1; -1/2 => (2)/(-3/2)=-4/3; -##\infty## => -2)

Transformations ## z => w## of the type ##w=(az+b)/(cz+d)## in the complex plane are called bilinear transformations (Mobius transformations). They have nice properties that make them very convenient to use.
 
Last edited:
Consider when ##x=\pm \infty##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K