Find the minimum premeter for a rectangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brown Arrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Rectangle
Click For Summary
To minimize the perimeter of a rectangular field adjacent to a river, it is established that the length should be twice the width. The area of the rectangle is constant, leading to the relationship A = L * W. By substituting L with 2W in the perimeter equation, P = L + 2B, and differentiating, the minimum perimeter can be found. The critical point occurs when the derivative equals zero, confirming that the dimensions yield the least fencing required. This approach effectively balances the area constraint with the perimeter optimization.
Brown Arrow
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rectangular field to contain a given area is fenced off, along a stright river. if no fencing is required along the river, show that the lest amount of fencing will be required when the length of the field is twice its width.

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



i really don't get how to solve this,
my attempt:
1037vyx.jpg

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to maximize the Area, not the Perimeter !
 
but they said they want to minimize the fencing.

even if i did A=lXW, i would end up with A=2w2
if i derive it i get A'=4W, and W=0; ?? i don't get it sorry.
 
@Sammy : The area is given, isn't it?? Why would he want to maximize the area? He has to use the given relation for the area, put it in the perimeter relation and then differentiate it with respect to either length or breadth...find stationary points(where d/dl or d/db is 0) and then use a double differential test to check for maxima or minima.
Also, note how one side will not be fenced. That means a little change in the perimeter relation.

That means something like P = L + 2B and A = L * B. Put A in P to get P = L + 2A/L where A is constant. Find dP/dL and proceed as I said.
 
so if do it like this:
34e547a.jpg

but i still don't get it, are we not using the fact l=2w, if we did here i would get w=(Ao/(2))1/2

then it doesn't make any sense
 
SVXX said:
@Sammy : The area is given, isn't it?? Why would he want to maximize the area? He has to use the given relation for the area, put it in the perimeter relation and then differentiate it with respect to either length or breadth...find stationary points(where d/dl or d/db is 0) and then use a double differential test to check for maxima or minima.
Also, note how one side will not be fenced. That means a little change in the perimeter relation.

That means something like P = L + 2B and A = L * B. Put A in P to get P = L + 2A/L where A is constant. Find dP/dL and proceed as I said.
Yes, I suppose that's correct.
 
Then A is constant, so A' = 0.

Then P' = 2-(A/W2).

but P' = 0 at min.

0 = 2-(A/W2).

Solve for W.

This does work out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K