MHB Find the probability that all 7 witnesses would pick the same person.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rainbow1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
In a homicide case with 7 witnesses identifying a suspect from a lineup of 5 men, the probability that all witnesses would randomly pick the same person is calculated. Each of the last 6 witnesses has a 1/5 chance of matching the first witness's choice. This results in a probability of (1/5) raised to the power of 6, equating to 1 in 15625. This means that out of a million attempts, this scenario would occur approximately 64 times. The calculation highlights the rarity of such unanimous identification by random guessing.
rainbow1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
In a homicide case, 7 different witnesses picked the same man from a lineup. The line up contained 5 men. If the identification were made by random guesses, find the probability that all 7 witnesses would pick the same person.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint: the last 6 witnesses each have probability 1/5 of matching 1st witness.
 
Btw, that means exactly 64 times out of a million attempts!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top