MHB Find the smallest A satisfying the inequality

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the smallest real number A that satisfies the inequality involving the Fibonacci sequence defined by a_1 = 1, a_2 = 1, and a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} for n > 2. The specific inequality to be satisfied is \[\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} \leq A\] for any natural number k. Participants are tasked with determining the value of A that holds true for all k. The conversation highlights the mathematical approach to solving this inequality using properties of the Fibonacci sequence. Ultimately, the goal is to identify the smallest A that meets the criteria outlined in the inequality.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = 1$ and $a_n = a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}$ for each $n > 2$. Find the smallest real number, $A$, satisfying

\[\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} \leq A\]

for any natural number $k$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Let $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = 1$ and $a_n = a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}$ for each $n > 2$. Find the smallest real number, $A$, satisfying

\[\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} \leq A\]

for any natural number $k$.

we have
$\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+1}}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+2}- a_i}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$ (from given condition)
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}(\frac{1}{a_i} - \frac{1} {a_{i+2}})$
above term is positive and telescopic sum so maximum sum is sum at infinite and adding we get
$\frac{1}{a_1a_2} + \frac{1}{a_2a_3}$ and se get putting the values $\frac{3}{2}$
 
kaliprasad said:
we have
$\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+1}}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+2}- a_i}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$ (from given condition)
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}(\frac{1}{a_i} - \frac{1} {a_{i+2}})$
above term is positive and telescopic sum so maximum sum is sum at infinite and adding we get
$\frac{1}{a_1a_2} + \frac{1}{a_2a_3}$ and se get putting the values $\frac{3}{2}$

Hi, kaliprasad

With your telescoping sum, I get:
\[\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} = \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left ( \frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{i+1}a_{i+2}} \right )\\ =\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_2a_3}+\frac{1}{a_2a_3}-...+ \frac{1}{a_{k-1}a_k}-\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}+\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \\ = \frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} = 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}}.\]

So the smallest possible $A$, that satisfies the inequality is:
\[\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty }\left ( 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \right ) = 1.\]
 
lfdahl said:
Hi, kaliprasad

With your telescoping sum, I get:
\[\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} = \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left ( \frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{i+1}a_{i+2}} \right )\\ =\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_2a_3}+\frac{1}{a_2a_3}-...+ \frac{1}{a_{k-1}a_k}-\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}+\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \\ = \frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} = 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}}.\]

So the smallest possible $A$, that satisfies the inequality is:
\[\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty }\left ( 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \right ) = 1.\]

it is my mistake.
Your telescopic sum and hence limit is right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top