Find units of rate constants and write reactions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the units of rate constants (k1, k2, k3, k4, k5) and writing the rate equations for the change in concentration of reactant A over time (dA/dt) for various chemical reactions. The scope includes homework-related queries and mathematical reasoning regarding reaction kinetics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant provides initial equations for dA/dt and suggests units for each rate constant, proposing that k1 and k2 have units of s-1, while k3 and k4 have units of L/mol·s.
  • Another participant agrees with the units but questions the dependency of the change in A on C in reaction b, suggesting that it should depend on A and B instead.
  • Some participants express confusion about the signs of the rate constants and the formulation of the rate equations, particularly regarding the correct expressions for dA/dt.
  • There is a suggestion that the rate equations should include negative signs to reflect the consumption of A in reactions.
  • A participant proposes revised equations for reactions b, c, and d, questioning the impact of the stoichiometry on the rate expressions.
  • Another participant emphasizes that rate constants are always positive and that the reaction products do not affect the rate of change of reactants directly.
  • Several participants engage in clarifying the correct formulation of the rate equations and the relationships between the rates of change of different species involved in the reactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the units of the rate constants, but there is disagreement regarding the correct formulation of the rate equations for reactions b, c, and d. The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to refine their understanding and express differing views on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of expressing the rate equations in terms of concentrations of reactants and products, while others note that the derivation of these equations may depend on conservation principles. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the stoichiometry of the reactions and the implications for the rate expressions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying chemical kinetics, particularly those looking to understand the formulation of rate equations and the significance of units in reaction mechanisms.

marimari
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the units of k1, k2, k3, k4, and k5. Write rate reactions for dA/dt

a. A\leftrightarrowB
k1 (forward)
k2 (backward)

b. A + B \rightarrow C
k3 (forward)

c. A + R \rightarrow 2R
k4 (forward)

d. A \rightarrow B
k5 (forward)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a. \frac{d[A]}{dt} = k1[A] - k2
units of k1 & k2 are in s^{-1}
b. \frac{d[A]}{dt} = -k3[C]
units of k3 are in L/mol*s
c. \frac{d[A]}{dt} = -k4[R]^2
units of k4 are in L/mol*s
d. \frac{d[A]}{dt} = -k5
units of k5 are in s^{-1}

Are these correct? I'm a little confused since the problem specified finding dA/dt rather than each of the products. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks all OK to me.

Except for first order I never remember the units of the top of my head. But you shouldn't be confused, it is quite easy:

[A] means moles.litre-1.

/dt is s-1

on the RHS, [A] is moles.litre-1.
[A]2 is moles2.litre-2
[A]ab[C]c... is molesa+b+c+....litre-(a+b+c+...)

So e.g. for a 2nd-order reaction like b

moles.litre-1.s-1 = k x moles2.litre-2


Isolate k by dividing both sides by moles2.litre-2 and after any cancellations you have it.

Do they insist nowadays, mnyah mnyah, you write out the cumbrous moles.litre-1 etc?

M used to be good enough. Or rather, better.
 
I would expect different signs for all "k", but that is probably just a convention issue.

At b, why does the change of A depend on C (and not on A and B), if C does not react at all? The same applies to c and d.
At b, how can you get units different from your answers at (a) and (d)?
 
mfb said:
I would expect different signs for all "k", but that is probably just a convention issue.

At b, why does the change of A depend on C (and not on A and B), if C does not react at all? The same applies to c and d.

It doesn't depend on C.

Sorry I read your answer for the units which were all correct, not your equation which is not right. The answer for the units is right for b, c and d somehow, but your equations for those are wrong.

I happen to have written a post recently about how simple it is to write the rate equations for a given mechanism.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4304238&postcount=16

Rate constants are always positive.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the help! So, my equations are incorrect for b, c, d? I'm not sure how to write the reaction in terms of dA/dt, then. I know how to write them for dC/dt or dProduct/dt, but not for a reactant.
 
Wait a minute...
Am I just being an idiot?

Would
(b) simply be d[A]/dt = k3[A]

(c) d[A]/dt = k4[A][R]
actually I'm the most unsure about this one because of the 2R in the product. Would the rate be halved?

(d) d[A]/dt = k5[A]?
 
As A decreases in the reaction and the k-factors are always positive, those equations should have a minus sign. Apart from that, they are correct.
The reaction product (as long as it is not A) does not matter, even in case of (c). The amount of R will change in a more complicated way, of course.
 
Awesome! Thank you so much
 
Another quick question: Are my units correct as epenguin said?
 
  • #10
With the fixed equation in (b), they are all correct now.
 
  • #11
marimari said:
Thanks for all the help! So, my equations are incorrect for b, c, d? I'm not sure how to write the reaction in terms of dA/dt, then. I know how to write them for dC/dt or dProduct/dt, but not for a reactant.

Given conservation of mass, or better, given that in b one molecule of A generates one of C what is the relation of dC/dt to dA/dt? Etc.

If you don't have a doh! moment read through the first page or so of whatever book chapter your course is using.

I initially thought your problems were with the dimensions or units, it did not occur to me that anyone would have a difficulty with formulating the equations so I did not even look at yours. (However their derivation is explained in the link I gave in last post.) In the same way I missed that your a is also wrong! - make it -d[A]/dt on the left. A is disappearing by reacting, the more A there is the faster it disappears! After you have corrected that, you have a correct first stage. But a second stage, for a more useful equation, is to express all in terms of A, without B appearing in the equation. Using the idea of my 1st line above.
 
  • #12
marimari said:
Wait a minute...
Am I just being an idiot?

Would
(b) simply be d[A]/dt = k3[A]

(c) d[A]/dt = k4[A][R]
actually I'm the most unsure about this one because of the 2R in the product. Would the rate be halved?

(d) d[A]/dt = k5[A]?


b, c and d not quite, see my last post.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K