Find Work Done on 3.0kg Object: Calculation Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikejones2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done on a 3.0 kg object under the influence of a force, with the position of the object described by a cubic function of time. Participants are exploring the implications of this function and the necessary steps to find the work done over a specified time interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss deriving acceleration and force from the position function, with some attempting to integrate to find work, while others suggest alternative methods such as using power and considering the absolute value of force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on integrating force and velocity, while others are questioning the handling of variables and the need to split integrals based on the sign of the force. There is no explicit consensus on the correct method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of a non-constant force and the need to take absolute values in calculations. There are also concerns about the presence of variables in the derived equations and how to properly set up integrals for the work calculation.

mikejones2000
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The problem states:A single force acts on a 3.0 kg particle-like object in such a way that the position of the object as a function of time is given by x = 3.0t - 4.0t 2 + 1.0t 3, with x in meters and t in seconds. Find the work done on the object by the force from t = 0 to t = 3.0 s.

I found the acceleration by double derivation of the function and then multiplied the function by 3 to give me the force and then integrated but that did not work. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't need to integrate, just multiply the force you found by the distance. And allow me to take a guess that you integrated with respect to t? This is incorrect as the definition of work is the integral of force with respect to displacement.
 
Last edited:
Im sorry but for some reason I am not understanding the solution you stated. I still have a variable in my force equation after deriving the accerleration and don't understand what to do next. I understand that plugging in t=3 will give me the displacement that particle traveled in that particular time interval but not what to do next.
 
My apologies, I forgot there was a non constant force. Now, instanataneous power is given by;

[tex]P(t) = F(t)\cdot V(t)[/tex]

Now,

[tex]\text{Work} = \int P(t) \; dt[/tex]

Can you go from here?
 
The problem may be that you need to take the absolute value of the force before integrating. Although accelerating in the negative x-direction gives a negative force, this still takes positive work, since you are doing all the work, not a conservative potential.
 
I derived the velocity with respect to time from the function and then derived acceleration from the the velocity and multiplied the accerleration with the mass to find the force. I then multiplied the force with the velocity to find instantaneous power and integrated with respect to the displacement found by plugging in the time interval in the original position function but got a different solution. I must be doing something wrong, thanks for the help so far and I apologize if I am not getting something or taking too much of your time.
 
Did you take the modulus of the force as Status X suggested?

[tex]\text{Work} = \int^{3}_{0} |F(t)|\cdot V(t)[/tex]

Since, as Status points out, although work is being done in the negative direction, work is still being done by the force, work is a scalar not a vector. Technically you are taking two vectors, (force and displacement) and turning them into a scalar by using the dot product.
 
I don't really kow how to resolve my vector componets into something I can use the dot porudct for some reason. My force vector has one variable while my velocity vector is an exponential equation and am kinda clueless how to dot them.
 
What do you mean your "velocity vector is an exponential equation" ?
In this problem, we consider forces and velocities to be along only one direction and there is no need for dot products or even vectors for that matter .
Remember velocity, V = dx/dt .
Reread all the previous posts. The approach has been outlined clear enough .
 
  • #10
Okay, I'll try and simplify it further for you. You have your expression for displacement with respect to time and I have given you the integral;

[tex]\text{work} = \int^{3}_{0} |F(t)| \cdot v(t) \; dt[/tex]

Which can be written as;

[tex]\text{work} = \int^{3}_{0} \left| m\cdot\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^2} \right| \cdot\frac{dx}{dt} \; dt[/tex]

Does that make it more obvious?
 
  • #11
I followed the process as stated and keep getting a wrong solution for some reason, the following are the steps I took:
x=3t^3-4t^2+3t (dx/dt)=3t^2-8t+3 (|d^2x/d^2t|)=6t+8.
3(6t+8)=18t+24=F V=3t^2-8t+3
(18t+24)(3t^2-8t+3)=54t^3-120t^2-138t+72=P(t)
Integration of P(t) yields=(54t^4/4)-(120t^2/3)-(138t^2)/(2)+72t) from 0 to 3 seconds.
 
  • #12
mikejones2000 said:
(dx/dt)=3t^2-8t+3 (|d^2x/d^2t|)=6t+8.

This step isn't right. To take the absolute value, you'll have to find where the function becomes negative, and split it up around this point. For example:

[tex]|x-3|= \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} x-3 & \mbox{ if } x>3 \\ -(x-3) & \mbox{ otherwise} \end{array}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #13
{6t-8 if x>4/3
so |6t-8|={-(6t-8) otherwise.
I am not really sure how to run with this
 
  • #14
Now you integrate. You'll need to split up the integral: one that goes from 0 to 4/3 and one from 4/3 to 3.
 
  • #15
Wouldnt that give me the velocity function? Am i supposed to have two integrals of 6t-8 with those bounds, add them up and multiply by the mass and original velocity function and then integrate from 0 to 3?
 
  • #16
mikejones2000 said:
Wouldnt that give me the velocity function? Am i supposed to have two integrals of 6t-8 with those bounds, add them up and multiply by the mass and original velocity function and then integrate from 0 to 3?
No, you would do the two whole integrals seperatly, thus;

[tex]\int^{\frac{4}{3}}_{0} [ m(8-6t) ] \cdot (3t^{2} - 8t + 3) \; dt[/tex][tex]\int^{3}_{\frac{4}{3}} [ m(6t - 8) ] \cdot (3t^{2} - 8t + 3) \; dt[/tex]
 
  • #17
The problem with this 'problem' is that we end up with acceleration still having a 't' in it. So what i did was just change the integration from change in distance to change in time.

ie: dx = (3.0 - 8.0t + 3.0t^2)dt

acceleration is
6.0t - 8.0

F = ma = (3.0)(6.0t - 8.0)

I take the 3 out of the integral to make things simpler.
Also we now have limits of integration of 0.0s to 3.0sec

This gives us...

W = 3.0 integral ((6.0t - 8.0)(3.0 - 8.0t + 3.0t^2)dt
= 3.0 integral (18t^3 - 72t^2 + 82t - 24)dt
= (3.0)(4.5t^4 - 24t^3 + 41t^2 - 24t)
// Now we substitute 0.0sec to 3.0 sec for t and should get our answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K