Finding 1/n + 1/(n+1) + + 1/2n in terms of the Euler's constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter lkh1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Terms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the sum 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n as n approaches infinity can be expressed in terms of Euler's constant (γ = 0.577...). The discussion confirms that the limit converges to ln(2) as n increases. The derivation involves manipulating the harmonic series and logarithmic functions to isolate the desired limit. Participants clarified the importance of subsequences and the conditions under which limits can be combined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in calculus
  • Familiarity with the harmonic series and its properties
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions, specifically natural logarithm (ln)
  • Concept of Euler's constant (γ) and its significance in analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the harmonic series and its relation to logarithms
  • Learn about subsequences and their role in limit evaluation
  • Explore advanced limit techniques in calculus, including L'Hôpital's rule
  • Investigate the applications of Euler's constant in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and analysis, as well as anyone interested in the properties of series and limits involving Euler's constant.

lkh1986
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By using the Euler's constant (0.577...), express the limit of the sum 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n explicitly as n goes to infinity.

Homework Equations



The limit as n goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/n - In (n)] is the Euler constant, 0.577...

It has been deduced and shown previously that the limit of the sum 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n is between 0.5 and 1. And the value lies somewhere around 0.6-0.75.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the word "explicitly" in the question means that we need to express the answer in terms of the Euler's constant.

limit as n goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/n - In (n)] = 0.577...

Let a (subscript k) = 1/k + 1/(k+1) + ... + 1/2k and k<n

limit as k goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ...1/(k-1) + 1/k + 1/(k+1)+...+1/2k +1/(2k+1) ... 1/n - In (n)] = 0.577...

limit as k goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ...1/(k-1) + a(subscript k) + 1/(2k+1) ... 1/n - In (n)] = 0.577...

limit as k goes to infinity for [a(subscript k)] = 0.577... - limit as k goes to infinity [1/1 + 1/2 + ...1/(k-1)] - limit as k goes to infinity [(1/(2k+1) + ... + 1/n] + limit as k goes to infinity [In(n)]

Then I don't know how to continue. Perhaps I need to define other variables? It seems that k and n are a bit confusing...

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lkh1986 said:

Homework Statement



By using the Euler's constant (0.577...), express the limit of the sum 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n explicitly as n goes to infinity.

Homework Equations



The limit as n goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/n - In (n)] is the Euler constant, 0.577...

It has been deduced and shown previously that the limit of the sum 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n is between 0.5 and 1. And the value lies somewhere around 0.6-0.75.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the word "explicitly" in the question means that we need to express the answer in terms of the Euler's constant.

limit as n goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/n - In (n)] = 0.577...

Let a (subscript k) = 1/k + 1/(k+1) + ... + 1/2k and k<n

limit as k goes to infinity for [1/1 + 1/2 + ...1/(k-1) + 1/k + 1/(k+1)+...+1/2k +1/(2k+1) ... 1/n - In (n)] = 0.577...

This is wrong! What is n in your expression? Is n related somehow to k?

------------------------------

Ok, here's how I would tackle the problem. Let's denote the Euler Constant to be \gamma.

Let x_n = \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n} - \ln(n)

We know that:

\gamma = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_n = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n} - \ln (n) \right)

Since the limit of the sequence xn exists, all of its sub-sequences should have the same limit, too, right? Now consider the sub-sequence x2n

\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{2n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{2n} - \ln (2n) \right) = \gamma

\Rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{2n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left[ {\color{red}\left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n} \right)} + {\color{blue}\left( \frac{1}{n + 1} + ... + \frac{1}{2n} \right)} - \ln (2n) \right] = \gamma

You want to find the limit of the blue part, right?

Now, look at the red one, do you realize anything? Does it look "nearly" the same as something that you've already known? What can you do to make use of the Euler's Constant?

Well, let's see if you can find a way to continue. :)
 
Oh, the subsequence concept, yup. That's useful.

So, gamma = [lim as n goes to infinity (1/1+1/2+...+1/n)] + [lim as n goes to infinity (1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n)] - [lim as n goes to infinity (In (2n))]

Gamma = Gamma + lim as n goes to infinity (In (2n)) +[lim as n goes to infinity (1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n)] - [lim as n goes to infinity (In (2n))]

Canceling gamma at both sides, we have:
[lim as n goes to infinity (1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n)] = [lim as n goes to infinity (In (2n))] - lim as n goes to infinity (In (2n))

[lim as n goes to infinity (1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n)] = lim as n goes to infinity [In (2n/n)] = lim as n goes to infinity In (2) = In(2) = 0.693...

I used my Texas Instrument to calculate the value. When n = 71, the value obtained is 0.703723..., which is very close to In(2), so I believe In 2 is the correct answer?

Thanks for the help. ;)
 
Well, you're very close to correct.. :rolleyes:

Remember that, you can only break the limit of 2 sums into the sum of 2 limit, when both of the 2 limits exist:

\lim (x_n + y_n) = \lim x_n + \lim y_n only holds if the limits of both sequences xn, and yn exist.

lkh1986 said:
Oh, the subsequence concept, yup. That's useful.

So, gamma = [lim as n goes to infinity (1/1+1/2+...+1/n)] + [lim as n goes to infinity (1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n)] - [lim as n goes to infinity (In (2n))]

Both expressions diverge, so you cannot split it like that. try this instead:

\Rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{2n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left[ {\color{red}\left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n} -\ln (n) \right)} + \left( {\color{blue}\left( \frac{1}{n + 1} + ... + \frac{1}{2n} \right)} - \ln (2n) + \ln(n) \right) \right] = \gamma
 
Hm, everything looks good, but I think In 2 is the limit of 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n. The question asks for 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n, so the 1/n term is missing there. ;( But In 2 is correct I think.
 
lkh1986 said:
Hm, everything looks good, but I think In 2 is the limit of 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n. The question asks for 1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/2n, so the 1/n term is missing there. ;( But In 2 is correct I think.

You can modify it a little bit. It's still the same. How about, putting the term 1/n into the blue parentheses, and modifying the ln(...) terms a little bit? :)
 
VietDao29 said:
try this instead:

\Rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{2n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left[ {\color{red}\left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n} -\ln (n) \right)} + \left( {\color{blue}\left( \frac{1}{n + 1} + ... + \frac{1}{2n} \right)} - \ln (2n) + \ln(n) \right) \right] = \gamma

Even better, try this instead:
\Rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{2n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left[ {\color{red}\left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n-1} -\ln (n-1) \right)} + \left( {\color{blue}\left( \frac{1}{n} + \frac{1}{n + 1} + ... + \frac{1}{2n} \right)} - \ln (2n) + \ln(n-1) \right) \right] = \gamma
 
D H said:
Even better, try this instead:
\Rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{2n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left[ {\color{red}\left( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + ... + \frac{1}{n-1} -\ln (n-1) \right)} + \left( {\color{blue}\left( \frac{1}{n} + \frac{1}{n + 1} + ... + \frac{1}{2n} \right)} - \ln (2n) + \ln(n-1) \right) \right] = \gamma

Yay, this is great.
So, lim [1/1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/(n-1) - In(n-1)] = gamma

So the equation can be reduced to lim (1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/(2n)) = lim In[2n/(n-1)] = lim In 2 = In 2. Is this correct?

Thanks both of you for the help. ;)
 
lkh1986 said:
Yay, this is great.
So, lim [1/1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/(n-1) - In(n-1)] = gamma

So the equation can be reduced to lim (1/n + 1/(n+1) + ... + 1/(2n)) = lim In[2n/(n-1)] = lim In 2 = In 2. Is this correct?

Thanks both of you for the help. ;)

Looks fine to me. :)
 
  • #10
I am so happy to finally solve the problem. ;) Thanks again and have a nice day!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K