Finding a Scalar Function on a Bounded Surface

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of finding a scalar function defined on a bounded surface embedded in three-dimensional space. Participants explore concepts related to parameterization and the relationship between scalar functions and surfaces, particularly in the context of surface integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the method to find a scalar function, f(x,y,z), defined on a surface S, questioning whether it involves an inner product or functional composition.
  • Another participant asserts that the inner product of a scalar function and a surface does not make sense and expresses confusion over the notion of functional composition in this context.
  • A different participant suggests that the intention may be to parameterize the function f by the surface S, particularly for the purpose of surface integrals.
  • One participant clarifies their earlier misunderstanding regarding inner products, noting that they were conflating scalar and complex functions and emphasizing the relevance of parameterization for surface integrals.
  • Another participant explains that to find the function on the surface, one can parameterize the surface with two variables and substitute these into the scalar function, providing an example involving a parabolic surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the initial question regarding the relationship between the scalar function and the surface. While some seek clarification on the concepts involved, others provide methods for parameterization without reaching a consensus on the initial inquiry.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definition and representation of the surface S, as well as the specific nature of the scalar function f. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of mathematical concepts such as inner products and parameterization.

Eidos
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
Hi guys and gals

This is a conceptual question. Let's say I have a scalar function, [tex]f(x,y,z)[/tex] defined throughout [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex]. Further I have some bounded surface, S embedded in [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex].

How would I find the function f, defined on the surface S?

Would it be the inner product of f and S, [tex]<f|S>[/tex] or a functional composition like [tex]f \circ S[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f is a scalar, so inner product of S and f makes no sense. I don't know what you have in mind by functional composition
 
you mean you want parameterize f by s? as in restrict f to s? like for the purposes of a surface integral?
 
mathman said:
f is a scalar, so inner product of S and f makes no sense.
From what I understand the inner product <f|g> is
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)g^{*}(t)dt[/tex].

The mistake I made was to think that they are scalar functions as well even though f and g are complex functions. Sorry about that. The closest thing I've come to inner products for functions was the orthonormality of the basis functions for Fourier series. :blushing:

ice109 said:
you mean you want parameterize f by s? as in restrict f to s? like for the purposes of a surface integral?
This is exactly what I had in mind. Sorry I should have been more explicit where I was going with it.

I understand what we are doing if we have a vector field [tex]\textbf{F}[/tex] and want to find out how it permeates (eg. flux through a surface) a surface S but dotting it with the unit normal of the surface and integrating on the surface. This is actually what made me think of the inner product:
[tex]\iint\textbf{F}\cdot\textbf{n}\,\mathrm{dS}[/tex]

Thanks for the replies :smile:
 
That is the "inner product" only if you are thinking of f and g as vectors in L2.

You have a function, f(x,y,z), and are given a surface S. You don't say how you are "given" the surface but since it is two dimensional, it is always possible to parameterize it with two variables: on S, x= x(u,v), y= y(u,v), z= z(u,v). Replace x, y, and z in f with those: f(x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v).

For example, suppose you have the parabolic surface z= x2+ 2y2 and some function f(x,y,z). Then you can take x and y themselves as parameters and, restricted to that surface, your function is f(x,y,x2+ 2y2).
 
Thanks HallsofIvy that cleared things up :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K