Finding a set which is not equinumerous with series of sets

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Set Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding an infinite set that is not equinumerous with the series of sets defined as \( A_n \), where \( A_1 = \mathbb{Z^+} \) and \( A_{n+1} = \mathcal{P}(A_n) \). Participants suggest that the set \( \mathbb{Z^+} \times \mathbb{R} \) may not be equinumerous with any \( A_n \). The approach involves using induction and proving that \( A_n \) is not equinumerous with the union of all \( A_n \) sets, leading to a contradiction if assumed otherwise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cardinality and equinumerosity
  • Familiarity with power sets, specifically \( \mathcal{P}(A) \)
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Basic concepts of set theory, including unions of sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of cardinality in set theory
  • Study the implications of Cantor's theorem on power sets
  • Learn about the concept of uncountable sets and their characteristics
  • Explore advanced topics in set theory, such as the continuum hypothesis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in the foundations of mathematics and the study of infinite sets.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi
Let \( A_1=\mathbb{Z^+} \) and \( \forall n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\) let \( A_{n+1}=\mathcal{P}(A_n) \)

I have to come up with an infinite set which is not equinumerous with \( A_n \) for any \( n\in \mathbb{Z^+} \).
Clearly \( \mathbb{R}\) will not fit the bill since \( \mathbb{R}\;\sim\; A_2 \). So I was thinking of
the set \( \mathbb{Z^+}\times \mathbb{R} \). I will need to use induction here. But does my test function seem
right ?

Thanks
(Emo)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
Hi
Let \( A_1=\mathbb{Z^+} \) and \( \forall n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\) let \( A_{n+1}=\mathcal{P}(A_n) \)
I have to come up with an infinite set which is not equinumerous with \( A_n \) for any \( n\in \mathbb{Z^+} \).
Have you considered $\displaystyle\bigcup\limits_n {A_n }~? $
 
Ok, Plato I will try working on it. I think induction would be the way to go ...
 
IssacNewton said:
Ok, Plato I will try working on it. I think induction would be the way to go ...
Well $\forall n$ we know that $\left\| {A_n } \right\| \prec \left\| {A_{n + 1} } \right\|$.
 
So what I have to prove is that

\[ \forall\; n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\left [ A_n \nsim \bigcup_{n\in \mathbb{Z^+}} A_n\right ] \]

I figured that this is can be easily done by assuming negation and getting a contradiction that some set is equinumerous with its power set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K