MHB Finding a set which is not equinumerous with series of sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Set Sets
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi
Let \( A_1=\mathbb{Z^+} \) and \( \forall n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\) let \( A_{n+1}=\mathcal{P}(A_n) \)

I have to come up with an infinite set which is not equinumerous with \( A_n \) for any \( n\in \mathbb{Z^+} \).
Clearly \( \mathbb{R}\) will not fit the bill since \( \mathbb{R}\;\sim\; A_2 \). So I was thinking of
the set \( \mathbb{Z^+}\times \mathbb{R} \). I will need to use induction here. But does my test function seem
right ?

Thanks
(Emo)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
Hi
Let \( A_1=\mathbb{Z^+} \) and \( \forall n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\) let \( A_{n+1}=\mathcal{P}(A_n) \)
I have to come up with an infinite set which is not equinumerous with \( A_n \) for any \( n\in \mathbb{Z^+} \).
Have you considered $\displaystyle\bigcup\limits_n {A_n }~? $
 
Ok, Plato I will try working on it. I think induction would be the way to go ...
 
IssacNewton said:
Ok, Plato I will try working on it. I think induction would be the way to go ...
Well $\forall n$ we know that $\left\| {A_n } \right\| \prec \left\| {A_{n + 1} } \right\|$.
 
So what I have to prove is that

\[ \forall\; n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\left [ A_n \nsim \bigcup_{n\in \mathbb{Z^+}} A_n\right ] \]

I figured that this is can be easily done by assuming negation and getting a contradiction that some set is equinumerous with its power set.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top