Finding angular acceleration from torque

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a windmill given a net torque of 1500 N*m and the moment of inertia of its propellers. Each propeller weighs 45 kg, with a moment of inertia that is 65% of a rod's value when spun about its end. The challenge arises from the lack of specific dimensions, such as the length of the blades, which are necessary for determining the moment of inertia accurately. Participants suggest keeping the length as a variable in the calculations to express the angular acceleration in terms of this variable. Ultimately, the consensus is that the radius of motion is essential for the calculations, and the moment of inertia for all three propellers should be combined for a total.
mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
We have to analyze this video:

Givens:

1) An applied net torque due to the wind on the windmill is equal to 1500 N*m.

2) Each (of the 3) propeller props weighs approximately 45 Kg and has a Moment of Inertial equal to about 65% of that of a rod of the same mass being spun about its end.

3) This torque is applied for approximately 45 seconds before the explosion, prior to which the windmill was at rest.

Question: What was the angular acceleration caused by the torque?

So here's my attempt at it: T=Ia (a is alpha) T=ML^2/3 * a * .65 (due to the whole 65% thing. Actually not sure if I should put 3*M for each propeller)

And so this is where I get stuck. I'm not given L, so I'm not sure how to work around this. I could also use T=1/2*MR^2*a, but then I don't know R.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in that you would need to know the length of the blades, which is also the radius of the circle. The radius of motion is crucial for moment of inertia. It's more than crucial, it's "crucial squared." I watched the video, and there is no reasonable way to estimate the size of this turbine since there is nothing in the scene to compare it to. The best thing to do is keep the "L" in as a variable and find the answer in terms of a "coefficient times L"
such as "3.25 L^2." (But I made that number up).

And you can multiply the I of each propeller x 3 for the net I of the turbine, and I think that the .65 is correctly applied, if I am understanding the question correctly.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
813
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K