Finding Anti-commuting Complex structures

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GcSanchez05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Structures
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of anti-commuting complex structures on manifolds, particularly focusing on integrable complex structures and their implications in the context of hyper-Kähler manifolds. The participants explore the mathematical properties and conditions necessary for such structures to exist, especially in four-dimensional spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about finding a complex structure I that anti-commutes with a given complex structure J on a space with even dimension.
  • Another participant explains that if I and J are complex structures satisfying the relation IJ = -JI, then the product K = IJ also defines a complex structure, leading to a triplet of structures that satisfy quaternion algebra.
  • This triplet (I, J, K) is associated with hyper-Kähler manifolds, which require specific conditions such as the vanishing of the Ricci form for their existence.
  • A later reply emphasizes that while the existence of anti-commuting complex structures implies the existence of a third structure, it is not generally possible to find such structures on all manifolds due to the constraints involved.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the discussion, indicating a potential gap in their understanding of hyper-Kähler manifolds and related concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical framework involving anti-commuting complex structures and their relation to hyper-Kähler manifolds. However, there is no consensus on the general applicability of these structures, as some participants note that specific conditions must be met for their existence.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations regarding the generalizability of anti-commuting complex structures, particularly the necessity of the Ricci tensor vanishing, which may not hold for all manifolds.

GcSanchez05
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Say we complex structure J on a space with even dimension. Is there a trick to finding another complex stucture I that anti-commutes with J?

Moreover I'm that these be integrable complex structres. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose I, J are complex structures and

IJ = -JI

i.e., they anticommute. Then

[tex](IJ)^2 = (IJ)(IJ) = -(IJ)(JI) = + I^2 = -1[/tex]
and hence (IJ) is also a complex structure. Call it K. It is not too hard to verify that these 3 complex structures satisfy the quaternion algebra,

[tex]IJ = K, \qquad JK = I, \qquad KI = J, \qquad I^2 = J^2 = K^2 = IJK = -1[/tex]
Such a manifold is called hyper-Kaehler and must be of dimension 4n. A hyper-Kaehler manifold has holonomy Sp(n). In 4 real dimensions (i.e., n = 1), we have Sp(1) = SU(2). In general, Sp(n) is a subgroup of SU(2n). Hence all hyper-Kaehler manifolds are Calabi-Yau.

So, in order for such a triplet of complex structures to exist, it is at least necessary that the Ricci form vanish. In 4 real dimensions, this condition is also sufficient.

Suppose we're only interested in 4 dimensions. Define the orientation such that the Kaehler form J is anti-self-dual. Then I and K are also anti-self-dual, and orthogonal to J. That is, I, J, and K span the space [itex]\Lambda^2_- (M)[/itex]. So if you are given one of the complex structures, you can work out the others algebraically.
 
Well, I understood up to hyperkahler manifolds..

I'm participating in an REU and I think I'm venturing too far from my knowledge. Either way thank you for your explanations!
 
OK, well the general result is:

If two complex structures I, J exist and they anticommute, this implies that a third complex structure K = IJ exists, such that I, J, K are a representation of the unit quaternions. A manifold that has this structure is called "hyper-Kahler".

Only certain manifolds have this property, since it requires, among other things, that the Ricci tensor vanish. So you won't be able to find two anticommuting complex structures in general.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K