Extending a linear representation by an anti-linear operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on extending the linear representation of the group O(1,3) by incorporating the anti-linear operator T, which is expressed as T = CU, where U is unitary and C is the complex conjugation operator. The participants explore the implications of adding T to a representation of SO(1,3), noting that this transformation results in a non-linear representation. The central question raised is whether extending a linear representation of a group by the complex conjugation operator leads to a representation of a larger group, prompting a search for a suitable mathematical framework and references.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically O(1,3) and SO(1,3)
  • Familiarity with linear and anti-linear operators
  • Knowledge of unitary and anti-unitary transformations
  • Basic concepts of representation theory in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework for representations of groups, focusing on anti-linear operators
  • Explore the implications of complex conjugation in representation theory
  • Study the relationship between linear representations and larger groups
  • Examine references such as "Linear Representations of Finite Groups" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and researchers in representation theory, particularly those interested in the properties of linear and anti-linear operators within the context of group representations.

hideelo
Messages
88
Reaction score
15
When we consider representation of the O(1,3) we divide the representation up into the connected part of SO(1,3) which we then extend by adding in the discrete transformations P and T. However, while (as far as I know) we always demand that the SO(1,3) and P be represented as linear operators, we demand that T be anti-linear.

If I start with some representation of SO(1,3) and I extended it by including T. Since its anti linear and anti unitary it can be written as T = CU where U is unitary and C is the complex conjugation operator. Suppose U were already in SO(1,3), then while I say I am adding T really the only new object I am adding is C. So suppose I have any representation and I extend by C, what is this new object?

I am just looking for the mathematical framework in which to approach this. Once I add T it isn't a linear representation anymore, I see that we have some operators which are homomorphic to O(1,3) but this isn't a representation as I recognize it. So what is this?

While I am framing all this in the context of SO(1,3), it's only because that is how it arose for me. Really, I'm interested in the general question. Suppose I had some linear representation of some group which I then extend by the complex conjugation operator, thereby allowing anti-linear operators. Is this a representation of some bigger group?Any references, sources, etc would be really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I usually start with the definitions. A representation of ##O(1,3)## is a group homomorphism into ##\operatorname{GL}(V)##. As the orthogonal group is already a matrix group, we get one representation for free.

You could also have a look into:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387901086/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
993
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K