Finding Common Ratio of Geometric Progression for 3 Points on a Parabola

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three points on the parabola \(y^2=3x\) where the x-coordinates form a geometric progression and the corresponding y-coordinates form an arithmetic progression. The goal is to find the common ratio of the geometric progression.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationships between the coordinates, noting that \(q^2=rp\) and \(2b=c+a\) are key equations. There is confusion regarding the implications of \(b^2=\pm ac\) and whether this leads to \(a=c\). Some participants explore the consequences of all coordinates being equal.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the conditions set by the problem. Some participants suggest that if \(a=b=c\), then the geometric ratio must be 1, while others question whether this aligns with the definitions of geometric and arithmetic progressions. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, particularly the requirement for the x-coordinates to be in geometric progression while the y-coordinates are in arithmetic progression, all while adhering to the properties of the parabola.

thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(p,a) , (q,b) and (r,c) are the coordinates of three points on the parabola y^2=3x. If the x-coordinate for these three points form a geometric progression whereas the corresponding y-coordinate form an arithmetic progression, find the common ratio of the geometric progression.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



q^2=rp and 2b=c+a

Substitute those points into the parabola to get a^2=3p , b^2=3q and c^2=3r

q^2=rp

(b^4/9)=((a^2c^2)/9)

b^4=a^2c^2

b^2= +/- ac

This part confuses me. I would get a=c if i take it to be positive.

Then substituting into 2b=c+a, that would be b=a=c ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't even have to take the positive,

from [tex]b^2=\pm ac[/tex]
then [tex]b=\pm\sqrt{ac}[/tex] (since we can only take the root of a positive number, we scrap the [tex]b^2=-ac[/tex] result).

Substituting that into the arithmetic progression,

[tex]\pm 2\sqrt{ac}=a+c[/tex]

[tex]4ac=a^2+2ac+c^2[/tex]

[tex]a^2-2ac+c^2=0[/tex]

[tex](a-c)^2=0[/tex]

thus [tex]a=c[/tex] (and this is without assuming positive and negative cases, this is for both).

Right, so we get a=b=c. This is just telling us that it is impossible to have the criteria the question mentioned without the numbers all being equal. So what is the geometric ratio?
 
Mentallic said:
You don't even have to take the positive,

from [tex]b^2=\pm ac[/tex]
then [tex]b=\pm\sqrt{ac}[/tex] (since we can only take the root of a positive number, we scrap the [tex]b^2=-ac[/tex] result).

Substituting that into the arithmetic progression,

[tex]\pm 2\sqrt{ac}=a+c[/tex]

[tex]4ac=a^2+2ac+c^2[/tex]

[tex]a^2-2ac+c^2=0[/tex]

[tex](a-c)^2=0[/tex]

thus [tex]a=c[/tex] (and this is without assuming positive and negative cases, this is for both).

Right, so we get a=b=c. This is just telling us that it is impossible to have the criteria the question mentioned without the numbers all being equal. So what is the geometric ratio?

Thanks Mentallic, so would it be -1? How do i show that in my working?
 
No no. We've already proven that for x coords to be in a geometric progression and the corresponding y coords to be in an arithmetic progression, where the x and y coords lie on the parabola y2=3x, then we can only have that a=b=c which means all the coordinates much be the same.

The difference in the arithmetic progression of a,b,c must be 0 (since they're all equal, b-a=0 and c-b=0)
The ratio in the geometric progression p,q,r must then be 1 since a=b=c which says that all the points are equal, so p=q=r. Thus q/p=1 and r/q=1.
 
Mentallic said:
No no. We've already proven that for x coords to be in a geometric progression and the corresponding y coords to be in an arithmetic progression, where the x and y coords lie on the parabola y2=3x, then we can only have that a=b=c which means all the coordinates much be the same.

The difference in the arithmetic progression of a,b,c must be 0 (since they're all equal, b-a=0 and c-b=0)
The ratio in the geometric progression p,q,r must then be 1 since a=b=c which says that all the points are equal, so p=q=r. Thus q/p=1 and r/q=1.

Isn't that the ratio of a GP not equal to 1 and 0 ?
 
I don't understand what you just said...

If the terms in a geometric series are equal, then the ratio is 1 since we are multiplying by 1 each time. It's the only way it can be both a geometric series and an arithmetic series at the same time.
 
Mentallic said:
I don't understand what you just said...

If the terms in a geometric series are equal, then the ratio is 1 since we are multiplying by 1 each time. It's the only way it can be both a geometric series and an arithmetic series at the same time.

oh, from the formula of the sum of a GP, Sn=(a(1-r^n))(1-r) where r not equal 1. I was referring to this which is not at all our case. Now i understand, thanks Mentallic for your help.
 
Oh, that. Well yeah that formula works for [tex]r\neq 1[/tex]. For r=1 we can quickly conclude that it doesn't have to be seen as a geometric sequence anymore, but an arithmetic sequence as we've already seen. So the sum would obviously be [tex]S_n=an[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K