MHB Finding Complex Roots: Poles of $ \frac{1}{{z^4}+4} $, {z: |z-1| LE 2}

  • Thread starter Thread starter ognik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Roots
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the poles of the function \( \frac{1}{{z^4}+4} \) within the region defined by \( |z-1| \leq 2 \). Participants explore the use of exponential forms to calculate complex roots, with one user questioning the correctness of their derived poles compared to the expected results. The correct approach involves recognizing that \( z^4 = -4 \) leads to roots expressed in terms of \( e^{i\pi} \), rather than starting from zero. Additionally, there is clarification on why the angle for the roots should be \( \pi \) instead of \( 0 \) to accurately represent the complex number. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between angles and roots in complex analysis.
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
I think I'm a bit rusty here, started with finding poles for $ \frac{1}{{z^4}+4} $, {z: |z-1| LE 2}

1) Out of interest, is there a complex equivalent of the rational roots test? The above function is obvious, but for a poly that has both real and complex roots?

2) I am using the exponential form to find roots, ie for n roots, $ {z}_{k+1} = r^{-n}e^{i(\frac{\theta}{n} + k\frac{2\pi}{n})}, k=0,\pm1,\pm2...\pm(n-1) $ - is this formula correct? Is there a better way?

3) Using the above, $ (\theta = 0) $, I get the 4 poles to be $ {z}_{k+1} = \sqrt{2}e^{i( k\frac{2\pi}{n})} = \pm\sqrt{2}, \pm\sqrt{2}i $, but the answer given is $ \pm1 \pm i $, can anyone see what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $z^4+4 = 0$ then $z^4 = -4 = 4e^{i\pi}$. The fourth roots are given by $z = \sqrt2e^{i(2k+1)\pi/4}$.
 
Also, it can be useful the exersise 5 b) here.
 
Thanks both.

Fernando, the useful exercises you linked to, uses basically the same formula I had (although in CIS form) - except for the starting value, where they use pi - please tell me why pi and not 0?
 
ognik said:
Fernando, the useful exercises you linked to, uses basically the same formula I had (although in CIS form) - except for the starting value, where they use pi - please tell me why pi and not 0?
Take into accont that $4=4(\cos 0+i\sin 0)$ and $-4=4(\cos \pi +i\sin \pi).$
 
Of course, I should have thought of that myself, thanks Fernando.

(May I ask if you wouldn't mind having a look at an earlier post please - http://mathhelpboards.com/analysis-50/find-coefficiant-laurent-series-without-using-residue-15997.html)
 
Last edited:
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K