Finding Components of Perpendicular Vectors in a Cartesian System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnny Blade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the components of two vectors, c and d, which are perpendicular to a given vector a in a Cartesian coordinate system. The vectors c and d are specified to have a magnitude of 5 m, with c having a positive x component and d having a negative x component.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of "module" in the context of the problem, questioning whether it refers to the magnitude of the vectors or a different concept. There are attempts to establish equations based on the slope of the vectors and their magnitudes. Some participants suggest using substitution methods to find the components of the vectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the equations, while others express confusion about the terminology and the implications of the vectors' magnitudes. There is no explicit consensus on the definitions or the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential language barriers affecting the understanding of terms like "module," which may lead to different interpretations of the problem setup. There is also mention of the vectors being in opposite directions, which adds complexity to the discussion.

Johnny Blade
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Two vectors (c and d) are in a xy Cartesian system and they are perpendicular to the "a" vector (ax=3.2, ay=1.6) and they have a module of 5 m. The vector c has a positive x component, and the other, d, has a negative x component.

b) What are the x and y components of the vector "c"?
c) What are the x and y components of the vector "d"?


Homework Equations



I found the slope of the c and d vectors. m=-2. With the slope I made this: (c-d)^2+(-2c+2d)^2=25



The Attempt at a Solution



I think I need to find another equation and use substitution with the above equation, but now I can't think of another equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with the term "module" in this context. Is that the magnitude of each of the two vectors c & d, or is it somehow their total length, end to end?

You are on the right track getting the slope of c & d. But I don't quite get this part:

"(c-d)^2+(-2c+2d)^2=25"

If the magnitude of c is 5, then you will have [tex]\sqrt{{c_x}^2 + {c_y}^2} = 5[/tex]

And the 2nd equation comes from your knowing the slope, which is the ratio of [tex]c_x[/tex] and [tex]c_y[/tex]

Does that help?
 
Module might be a mistake on my part. I go at a French school, so I translated this problem with limited knowledge of English terms.

Module is like the [tex]d_R[/tex] (Déplacement resultant). It's the distance between the start of the first vector and the end of the last vector.

Because the module of them is 5 wouldn't this [tex](c-d)^2 + (-2c+2d)^2 = 25[/tex] be the right equation?

With the second equation I will find c, and then I would substitute it in the first equation to find the d.
 
Last edited:
Is the module the magnitude of a vector? I'm confused because you said the length of them is 5.

But you also said it is the length from the start of the first vector, to the end of the last...
 
Last edited:
I'm still not tracking what you are saying, Johnny_Blade. The sketch that I drew for myself has the original vector going up and to the right, with the slope of 1/2. And the line that c and d are on is perpendicular, going through the origin with a slope of -2 as you said.

And I drew the vector c aong that line, starting at the origin and pointing down and right. I drew the d vector starting at the origin, pointing up and left along the same line as c. I labelled c with a length of 5, and I labelled d with a length of 5. Then the equations that I wrote in my first post would apply, and you can calculate the cartesian coordinates of the c and d vectors.

But if I'n not interpreting the problem statement and the term "module" correctly, then my sketch may not be correct.
 
I'll use it in a example.
[tex]\vec{c}=2m [E][/tex]

[tex]\vec{d}=3m [E][/tex]

[tex]\vec{d_R}[/tex] (this is like the module, except the module is the quantity only.) [tex]=?[/tex]

[tex]\vec{d_R}=\vec{c}+\vec{d}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{d_R}=5m [E][/tex]

The module is [tex]5m[/tex].
 
Last edited:
we know that c and d are in opposite directions...

Suppose I write [tex]\vec{c} = A\vec{u}[/tex] where u is a unit vector in the direction of c... so the magnitude of c is A.

and suppose the magnitude of d is B.

so [tex]\vec{d} = -B\vec{u}[/tex]

so [tex]\vec{c}+\vec{d} = (A - B)\vec{u}[/tex]

Does that mean A-B is the module of c and d. (or B-A if B>A) ?

There seems to be infinite solutions for A-B = 5. or B-A = 5 etc...
 
learningphysics said:
There seems to be infinite solutions for A-B = 5. or B-A = 5 etc...

I agree. If each is 5m long, then the problem is solvable. If the difference is 5m, there are infinitely many solutions to the problem as stated. Johnny -- can you maybe provide a pointer to a web page that defines the "module" of vectors? Even if it is in French, that might help.
 
I'll check at school tomorrow. Maybe I made a mistake somewhere in my notes or something.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K