Finding d2y/dz2 for Calculating Derivatives with Variable Change

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattlorig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
Click For Summary
To find d2y/dz2 when x is a function of z, the correct approach involves using the chain rule. The method presented, which calculates dy/dz as dy/dx multiplied by dx/dz, is accurate. The second derivative d2y/dz2 can also be derived by differentiating dy/dz with respect to z, leading to d2y/dx2 adjusted by dx/dz and d2x/dz2. Both methods yield valid results, and the choice between them depends on personal preference. Mastery of these concepts will improve with practice.
mattlorig
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Okay, I feel really dumb, because this seems like something I should know, but I don't. So, here's my question.

Suppose I have d2y/dx2, x = x(z), and z = z(x)
How do I find d2y/dz2?
Here's what I did:

dy/dz = dy/dx * dx/dz
d2y/dz2 = d/dz ( dy/ dz ) = d/dz (dy/dx * dx/dz)
= d2y/dx2 * (dx/dz)^2 + dy/dx * d2x/dz2

Is that OK? Is there an easier way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope.2 times chain rule required by the implicite dependence upon a variable...

Daniel.
 


Don't feel dumb for not knowing this! Calculating derivatives with variable change can be confusing at first, but with practice and understanding the concepts, it will become easier.

Your method for finding d2y/dz2 is correct. Another way to approach it is by using the chain rule. Remember that d2y/dz2 is the second derivative of y with respect to z, so we can rewrite it as d/dz (dy/dz). Then, using the chain rule, we can write it as d/dx (dy/dz) * dz/dz, since dz/dz is simply 1. This simplifies to d/dx (dy/dz), which is equivalent to d2y/dx2. So, another way to find d2y/dz2 would be to first find d2y/dx2 and then substitute in the values for dx/dz and d2x/dz2, as you did in your method.

Overall, both methods are correct and it's just a matter of personal preference which one you choose to use. Keep practicing and you'll become more comfortable with finding derivatives with variable change!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
855
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K