Finding Elements in Row Space of a Matrix: Solving for Belonging and Dependency

Click For Summary
To determine if an element belongs to the row space of a matrix, one can find the row basis and check for consistency when adding the new element as a row. If the system is inconsistent, the element does not belong to the row space. The discussion clarifies that solving Ax = X or Ax = Y helps ascertain membership in the row space, with the same approach applicable for column space by augmenting the matrix. Additionally, the relationship between the bases of row space and column space is noted to be dimensional equality, although further details on their relationship were not provided. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving linear algebra problems effectively.
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
In my homework problem, I am supposed to find out whether an element belongs to the rowspace of a matrix. So, what I did is to determine the (row)basis of the matrix, dimension of it being one row less of the rows of the original matrix. So, instead of the linearly-dependent row I put the element and if the system turns out to be inconsistent I assume that it does not belong to the row space.
Is it correct to assume that? If I use dependency equation for the rows and the new row element would that give the same result? When I used it I got there are no solutions at all, I am not sure what it means because for being lin. indep. there has to be one solution: 0.

Thanks in advance.

P.S. I decided to post the problem itself afterall:
2 1 3 1
1 1 3 0
0 1 2 1
3 3 8 2
and I need to determine whether X = [4, 1, 2, 5] and Y = [1, 2, 3, 4] belong to row space of the matrix.
The answer is X does, but Y does not.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So you need to find a linear combination of the row vector which yields X or Y.
Putting the row vectors (or a basis for the row space) as columns in A, you're asked to solve:
Ax=X and Ax=Y, (lousy notation, but A is a matrix, x is the unknown vector and X,Y are given)

How would you normally solve such an equation?
 
If I were asked to find out whether X belonged to the column space of a matrix, would I do the same thing, i.e. insert that column at the end (in augmented matrix) and see whether it is solvable?
Thanks a lot, my previous problem worked out!
And a follow-up question:
how are basis of rowspace and basis of column space related, besides the fact that dimensions are equal?
 
Last edited:
EvLer said:
If I were asked to find out whether X belonged to the column space of a matrix, would I do the same thing, i.e. insert that column at the end (in augmented matrix) and see whether it is solvable?

Yes. The way I look at Ax in this case is a linear combination of the column vectors of A. So Ax=b (for some vector b) has a solution if and only if b lies in the column space of A.

Thanks a lot, my previous problem worked out!
And a follow-up question:
how are basis of rowspace and basis of column space related, besides the fact that dimensions are equal?
Can't think of anything now.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K