Finding energy of an electron analytically

  • Thread starter Thread starter foota
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Energy
Click For Summary
To find the energy of an electron in an orbital, one can measure the wavelength of light emitted when the electron is excited, but no simple formula exists for this calculation. The Schrödinger equation provides a formal solution, but analytical solutions are only feasible for hydrogen and a few simplified models. For more complex elements with multiple electrons, numerical methods are required due to the complexity of the many-body problem. While approximations exist for helium, they are often either inaccurate or cumbersome to calculate. Ongoing research in fields like quantum chemistry and solid-state physics aims to develop better methods for approximating these solutions.
foota
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How would you find the energy of an electron in a given orbital in an element? I'm pretty sure from what I understand that you could excite the electron and measure the wavelength of light given off and find the difference, but is there some formula that at least approximates this energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formally, one may solve the Schrödinger equation. For complex elements (i.e. elements that have more than one electron present) numerical methods become necessary.
 
It can't be done analytically for anything other than hydrogen. (And some fake atoms like 'harmonium') There are approximations for helium that can be hand-calculated, but even those are either inaccurate or tedious.

There are several whole fields of science (e.g. quantum chemistry, solid-state physics) largely devoted to finding better and faster approximations of this. So obviously: no simple "formula" is known. It's a many-body problem, so there are some mathematical reasons to believe no such simple formula exists, either. (among other things, it'd likely prove P = NP) But people are developing new methods of calculating and approximating the solutions every day, as well as applying the existing methods to learning new stuff.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K