MHB Finding GCD of $(1+\sqrt2)^{2017}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gcd
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find the greatest common divisor of the natural numbers, $a$ and $b$, satisfying:
$$\left(1+\sqrt{2}\right)^{2017} = a + b \sqrt{2}.$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Find the greatest common divisor of the natural numbers, $a$ and $b$, satisfying:
$$\left(1+\sqrt{2}\right)^{2017} = a + b \sqrt{2}.$$

first let us see the relationship of gcd(a,b) and gcd(c,d) where $(c+d\sqrt{2}) = (a+b\sqrt{2})(1+\sqrt{2})$
we get by mutiplication $c= a + 2b , d= a+b)$
so $gcd(c ,d) = gcd(a+2b, a + b) = gcd(a+b,b) = gcd(a,b)$
starting with power 1 we have $a= 1, b= 1$ so gcd 1
just to cross check for power 2 we have $(1+\sqrt{2})^2 = 3+ 2\sqrt{2})$ and gcd = 1
so we get the result as 1 using above rule repeatedly
 
kaliprasad said:
first let us see the relationship of gcd(a,b) and gcd(c,d) where $(c+d\sqrt{2}) = (a+b\sqrt{2})(1+\sqrt{2})$
we get by mutiplication $c= a + 2b , d= a+b)$
so $gcd(c ,d) = gcd(a+2b, a + b) = gcd(a+b,b) = gcd(a,b)$
starting with power 1 we have $a= 1, b= 1$ so gcd 1
just to cross check for power 2 we have $(1+\sqrt{2})^2 = 3+ 2\sqrt{2})$ and gcd = 1
so we get the result as 1 using above rule repeatedly
Well done, kaliprasad!
Below are two alternative solutions:

Solution I.

Note, that $(1+\sqrt{2})^{2017}(1-\sqrt{2})^{2017}=-1$.

If we expand $(1+\sqrt{2})^{2017}$ and $(1-\sqrt{2})^{2017}$ by Newton´s binomial formula, we readily see, that $(1-\sqrt{2})^{2017} = a-b\sqrt{2}$, since irrational terms of the expansions are terms with odd power of $\sqrt{2}$.
Therefore, $(1+\sqrt{2})^{2017}(1-\sqrt{2})^{2017}=(a+b\sqrt{2})(a-b\sqrt{2})=a^2-2b^2.$ Thus, $a^2-2b^2=-1$. Now, if $d$ is a greatest common divisor of $a$ and $b$, then $d|a^2$ and $d|b^2$, and therefore
$d|(a^2-2b^2)=-1$. Thus, $d=1$.

Solution II (induction).

For $n = 1,2,.. $ define the natural numbers $a_n$ and $b_n$ by $(1+\sqrt{2})^n=a_n+b_n\sqrt{2}.$ We prove, that the greatest common divisor of $a_n$ and $b_n$ is equal to $1$ for every $n = 1,2,...$.
Clearly, $a_1 = b_1 = 1$. From

\[a_{n+1}+b_{n+1}\sqrt{2}=(1+\sqrt{2})^{n+1}=(1+\sqrt{2})^n(1+\sqrt{2}) \\\\=(a_n+b_n\sqrt{2})(1+\sqrt{2}) = a_n+2b_n+(a_n+b_n)\sqrt{2}\]

it follows, that

\[a_{n+1} = a_n+2b_n, \: \: \: b_{n+1} = a_n+b_n\]

Now, any common divisor of $a_{n+1}$ and $b_{n+1}$ also divides $2b_{n+1}-a_{n+1} = a_n$ and $a_{n+1}-b_{n+1}= b_n$ and so is a common divisor of $a_n$ and $b_n$. Therefore, gcd$(a_{n+1},b_{n+1})= 1$, whenever gcd$(a_{n},b_{n})= 1$. Since, gcd$(a_1,b_1)= 1$, it follows by induction, that gcd$(a_{n},b_{n})= 1$ for all positive integers $n$. Particularly, gcd$(a,b)=$ gcd$(a_{2017},b_{2017})= 1$.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top