Finding Generators for a Group G when Generators for Imh and Kerh are Known

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators Group Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the problem of finding generators for a group G given generators for its image Imh under a homomorphism h and its kernel Kerh. The participants establish that a Short Exact Sequence 1 --> Kerh --> G --> Imh --> 1 can be utilized to derive a generating set for G. By pulling back generators from Imh and combining them with generators from Kerh, they conclude that the set {a_1,...,a_n, c_1,...,c_m} serves as a valid generating set for G, where {a_i} are generators of Kerh and {c_i} correspond to elements mapping to generators of Imh.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically homomorphisms and exact sequences.
  • Familiarity with the definitions of image (Imh) and kernel (Kerh) of a homomorphism.
  • Knowledge of isomorphisms and their implications in group theory.
  • Basic skills in algebraic manipulation of group elements and generators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Short Exact Sequences in group theory.
  • Learn about group extensions and their applications in algebra.
  • Explore the concept of generators and relations in group theory.
  • Investigate the implications of isomorphisms in the context of homomorphisms.
USEFUL FOR

Algebraists, graduate students in mathematics, and researchers focusing on group theory and its applications in abstract algebra.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, Algebraists:

Say h:G-->G' is a homomorphism between groups, and that we know a set
of generators {ki} for Imh:=h(G)<G' , and we also know of a set of generators
{b_j} for Kerh . Can we use these two sets {ki} and {bj} of generators for
Imh and Kerh respectively, to produce a set of generators for G itself?

It looks a bit like the group extension problem (which I know very little about,
unfortunately).

This is what I have tried so far :


We get a Short Exact Sequence:

1 -->Kerh -->G-->Imh -->1

But I am not sure this sequence necessarily splits (if it doesn't split, then you must acquit!)



It would seem like we could pull-back generators of Imh back into G, i.e., for any g in G, we can write h(g)=Product{$k_i$ $e_i$} of generators in h(G).

Similarly, we know that G/Kerh is Isomorphic to h(G) , and that g~g' iff h(g)=h(g') ( so that,the isomorphism h':G/Kerh-->h(G) is given by h'([g]):=h(g) )

But I get kind of lost around here.

Any Ideas?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


My thoughts are this:

Take \{a_1,...,a_n\} generators of ker(f), and take \{b_1,...,b_m\}generators of im(f). For every bi, we can find a ci such that f(c_i)=b_i. Then \{a_1,...,a_n,b_1,...,b_m\} is a generating set for G.

Indeed, take g in G, then we can write f(g) as

f(g)=b_{i_1}...b_{i_j}=f(c_{i_1})...f(c_{i_j})=f(c_{i_1}...c_{i_j})

Thus

f(gc_{i_1}^{-1}...c_{i_j}^{-1})\in Ker(f),

so we can write

gc_{i_1}^{-1}...c_{i_j}^{-1}=a_{k_1}...a_{k_l},

so that follows

g=c_{i_1}...c_{i_j}a_{k_1}...a_{k_l}

We have writte g as a combination of the suitable elements, so the set \{a_1,...,a_n,c_1,...,c_m\} is generating...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
988
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K