Finding Inductance: Solving Homework Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josh225
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inductance
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
Josh225
Messages
51
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


See attached image.

Homework Equations


The only equation that I have learned to find inductance is : L= μ N2 A / ι

However, when I do this, I get the incorrect answer. I am not so sure what is going on in the given solution and was wondering if somebody could explain that to me.The last step of the solution shows the equation that I stated, but how come you arent able to just plug numbers in directly?

Thank you in advanced!

The Attempt at a Solution



L= (4 Pi x 10-7) (1002) (.25) / 1" = 3.14 x 10-3[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 20160717_131526-1.jpg
    20160717_131526-1.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
Josh225 said:

Homework Statement


See attached image.

Homework Equations


The only equation that I have learned to find inductance is : L= μ N2 A / ι

However, when I do this, I get the incorrect answer. I am not so sure what is going on in the given solution and was wondering if somebody could explain that to me.The last step of the solution shows the equation that I stated, but how come you arent able to just plug numbers in directly?

Thank you in advanced!

The Attempt at a Solution



L= (4 Pi x 10-7) (1002) (.25) / 1" = 3.14 x 10-3[/B]
You need to work completely in MKS. You need the area A in square meters-I think you simply put in the diameter in inches. You also need the length L in meters. Your answer will then be in Henrys.
 
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Also, when I plug all the correct numbers in and run the equation through, it comes out to .01568 and I have to move the decimal 3 places to the right (like the answer is in meters and I need to convert to millimeters).
I am honestly not so hot wih unit conversion, so I was wondering what an easy way would be for me to remember to move the decimal in this case.

Also, what is the significance of writing the answer in μH as opposed to just H?
 
Charles Link said:
## \mu ## means 1.0 E-6. I'd like to see your calculations, particularly for area ## A ## to see what you got. The arithmetic here should be pretty routine. You might need a little practice with exponents, etc.

Hmmm I was under the impression that "μ" meant permeability and the letter following it represented a specific number (μo = 4 pi x 10-7) (still can't find that pi button on here!).

I kinda "cheated" and looked up some of the conversion.. I really do need to practice them, but to find "A" I did:
Pi (d)2 / 4
Pi (6.35 mm)2 /4
= 31.7 m2
 
Josh225 said:
Hmmm I was under the impression that "μ" meant permeability and the letter following it represented a specific number (μo = 4 pi x 10-7) (still can't find that pi button on here!).

I kinda "cheated" and looked up some of the conversion.. I really do need to practice them, but to find "A" I did:
Pi (d)2 / 4
Pi (6.35 mm)2 /4
= 31.7 m2
Those are millimeters you have there. 1mm=1.0E-3 m. This will give you a 1.0E-6 (m^2) when it gets squared. As area goes, this cylinder has a small area (cross section). Meanwhile 31.7 m^2 is about as big as an average living room.
 
Charles Link said:
Those are millimeters you have there. 1mm=1.0E-3 m. This will give you a 1.0E-6 (m^2) when it gets squared. As area goes, this cylinder has a small area (cross section). Meanwhile 31.7 m^2 is about as big as an average living room.

Oh dang haha. Quite a difference. So it would be 31.7 μm2... Which would actually equal 3.17E-5 m, right?
 
Charles Link said:
You need to call it 3.17 E-5 "m^2", (square meters), but otherwise correct.

Strange.. In my book it's expressed as 31.7 μm2.
 
Oh! I see. Thank you for the info!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Josh225 said:
Hmmm I was under the impression that "μ" meant permeability and the letter following it represented a specific number (μo = 4 pi x 10-7)
It depends on context. Certainly, ##\mu## is the symbol for permeability, both as ##\mu_{\scriptsize 0}## and relative permeability, ##\mu_r##. But you have also seen ##\mu## denoting the coefficient of friction of a surface; and the most common encounter is in association with units as a dimensionless multiplier meaning ×10-6 and written as a prefix pronounced "micro", e.g., ##7\ \mu V##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
NascentOxygen said:
It depends on context. Certainly, ##\mu## is the symbol for permeability, both as ##\mu_{\scriptsize 0}## and relative permeability, ##\mu_r##. But you have also seen ##\mu## denoting the coefficient of friction of a surface; and the most common encounter is in association with units as a dimensionless multiplier meaning ×10-6 and written as a prefix pronounced "micro", e.g., ##7\ \mu V##.
Very good comment. For the OP: In the second part of the above problem, they use the letter ## \mu_r ## for the permeability of the iron inside the inductor. To avoid any confusion, it would be nice if they could use a different letter for both the magnetic ## \mu_o=4 \pi E-7## and the magnetic ## \mu_r =2000 ##, because the ## \mu ## in ## \mu m^2 ## and ## \mu H ## means 1.0E-6, but in the magnetic theory, ## \mu ## (in this problem with a subscript) is the letter that the science people have chosen for these magnetic parameters.