Finding intersection of three planes

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the intersection of three planes defined by the vectors n1, n2, and n3. The original n3 vector (1, -2, -5) results in the planes not intersecting at a single point, as it is a linear combination of n1 and n2, leading to three parallel lines. In contrast, changing n3 to (1, -2, -4) allows for a unique intersection point since it is not a linear combination of the other two vectors. The Rouché-Capelli theorem is referenced to explain the conditions under which the planes intersect. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of linear independence in determining the nature of intersections among planes.
Tarrius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm having trouble with this question, any help would be much appreciated! :)

Q1: Given the three vectors:

n1 = (1, 2, 3)
n2 = (3, 2, 1)
n3 = (1, −2, −5)

Find the intersection of the three planes ni*x = 0. What happens if n3 = (1, −2, −4)? Why is this different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with vector spaces and matrix rank?
 
Tarrius said:
Hi!

I'm having trouble with this question, any help would be much appreciated! :)

Q1: Given the three vectors:

n1 = (1, 2, 3)
n2 = (3, 2, 1)
n3 = (1, −2, −5)

Find the intersection of the three planes ni*x = 0. What happens if n3 = (1, −2, −4)? Why is this different?
Your original n3=(1,-2,-5) = n2-2n1 so the three planes don't intersect. The pairwise intersections (of the planes) are 3 parallel lines.

The other n3 would work since it is not a linear combination of the others.
 
mathman said:
Your original n3=(1,-2,-5) = n2-2n1 so the three planes don't intersect.
Actually they do intersect, just not in a single point as can be shown by the Rouché-Capelli theorem.
 
You don't really need to know linear algebra- just the basics of systems of equations.
The planes defined by the first three vectors are
x+ 2y+ 3z= 0
3x+ 2y+ z= 0
x- 2y- 5z= 0.

Find the general solution to that system (there is NOT a unique solution because the determinant of coefficients is 0). What does that define, geometrically. The second set of equations do NOT have 0 determinant so have a unique solution. What that solution is should be obvious.
 
da_nang said:
Actually they do intersect, just not in a single point as can be shown by the Rouché-Capelli theorem.
I forgot that the three parallel lines could be coincident.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K