Finding Jordan Normal Form for a 3x3 Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter springo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Normal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the Jordan normal form of the matrix \(\begin{bmatrix}-2 & 3 & 1\\ 0 & -4 & -1\\ 1 & 2 & -3\end{bmatrix}\). The eigenvalue -3 is identified as a triple root, leading to the characteristic polynomial \((M + 3I)^3 = 0\). Participants clarify that the nullspaces of \((M + 3I)^2\) and \((M + 3I)^3\) are not empty, and provide guidance on finding appropriate vectors for constructing the transformation matrix \(P\) that satisfies \(PJP^{-1} = M\). The correct choice of eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors is emphasized for achieving the Jordan form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jordan normal form and its significance in linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors, particularly in the context of matrices.
  • Knowledge of nullspaces and their role in determining generalized eigenvectors.
  • Proficiency in matrix operations, including multiplication and inversion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of finding Jordan normal forms for matrices with repeated eigenvalues.
  • Learn how to compute nullspaces for matrices, specifically \((M + 3I)^2\) and \((M + 3I)^3\).
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for matrix computations and ensure correct operations are applied.
  • Investigate the relationship between eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors in the context of linear transformations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, or anyone involved in computational mathematics using tools like Mathematica.

springo
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the Jordan normal form of:
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> -2 &amp; 3 &amp; 1\\ <br /> 0 &amp; -4 &amp; -1\\ <br /> 1 &amp; 2 &amp; -3<br /> \end{bmatrix}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I found the eigenvalues: -3 (x3)
I found a single eigenvector: [ 2 , -1 , 1 ]
But now I thought of finding the nullspaces of (M + 3I)2 and (M + 3I)3 (where is the matrix we're studying) but they're empty.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've already shown that the nullspace of (M+3I) is not empty since you have an eigenvalue of -3. Then how can the nullspaces of (M+3I)^2 and (M+3I)^3 be empty?? That would be silly. In fact, (M+3I)^3=0 since it satisfies it's characteristic polynomial. I suggest you try that calculation again.
 
Last edited:
Since -3 is a triple root, the characteristic equation must be (M+ 3)^3= 0. And, since every matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation, (M+ 3I)^3v= 0 for every vector v.
There must exist vectors, u, such that Mu= 3u and you have found one. Since the eigenvectors do not span the space, there must exist vectors, v, such that Mv is NOT 0 but (M+ 3I)^2 u= 0. Since (M+3I)0= 0 certainly, look for a vector such that (M+ 3I)v= [2, -1, 1]. Then you will have (M+ 3I)^2v= (M+ 3I)[2, -1, 1]= 0. Once you have found that v, look for w such that (M+ 3I)w= v.
 
Thanks for your replies!

Oh, this is bad. I was using Mathematica for my calculations, it turns out using 2 doesn't do a real matrix multiplication, it does a dot product or something similar. My bad...

Now I took as eigenvectors:
- (M + 3I)2 : [ 1 , 0 , 1 ]
- (M + 3I)3 : [ 0 , 0 , 1 ]
So that:
P=\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\ <br /> -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ <br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1<br /> \end{bmatrix}

But doing P·J·P-1 ≠ M
However taking [ 1 , 0 , 0 ] instead of [ 0 , 0 , 1 ] works, why is that?
 
Bump for help! :)
 
springo said:
Bump for help! :)

I'm really not sure what your are doing. What's J? (M+3I)=0. Anything is an eigenvector of that.
 
Dick said:
I'm really not sure what your are doing. What's J? (M+3I)=0. Anything is an eigenvector of that.

J is the Jordan normal form of M and P is the matrix so that P·J·P-1 = M.
 
it's not clear to me how you got [0, 0, 1]. As I said before, you want a "v" such that (M+3i)^2v= [2, -1, 1]. That means you have to solve
\begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; 3 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; -1 &amp; -1 \\ 1 &amp; 2 &amp; 0\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}2 \\ -1 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}.
That gives the equations x+ 3y+ z= 2 -y- z= -1, and x+ 2y= 1. The second equation is the same as z= -y+ 1 and the third is the same a x= -2y+ 1. Taking y= 0 would give v= (1, 0, 1) as you have.

Now look for u such that (M+ 3I)u= v which means you must have
\begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; 3 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; -1 &amp; -1 \\ 1 &amp; 2 &amp; 0\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}.
That gives the equations x+ 3y+ z= 1, -y-z= 0. and x+ 2y= 1. The second equation is the same as z= -y and the third equation x= -2y+1. Then the first equation is satisfied for all y. If you take y= 0, you get [1, 0, 1] the same as before, but if you take y= 1, you get u= [-1, 1, -1].

Let P be the matrix having those vectors as columns,
P= \begin{bmatrix}2 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 \\ -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 1 &amp; -1\end{bmatrix}
and you will find that
P^{-1}AP= \begin{bmatrix}-3 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\0 &amp; -3 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -3\end{bmatrix}.
 
The thing is I was taking for the first column of P, an eigenvector of M. For the second one, a vector that is the nullspace of (M+3I)2 but is not an eigenvector of M. For the third one, a vector that is in the nullspace of (M+3I)3 (which is R3) but not in the eigenspace of (M+3I)2. Isn't that a right thing to do?
I mean: (M+3I)3 = 0 so (M+3I)3·[ 0 , 0 , 1 ] = 0.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K