MHB Finding Minimum Value of $n$ for Given Sum and Product

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$n\in N,\,\,and \,\, a_1,a_2,a_3,-------,a_n\in Z$
$if \,\, a_+a_2+a_3+-----+a_n=a_1\times a_2\times a_3\times------\times a_n=2006$
$find \,\, min(n)$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My attempt:

The prime factorization of $2006$ is $2\cdot17\cdot59$. This leaves very few possibilities to express $2006$ as a product of integers:(i). $2\cdot17\cdot59$. Sum of factors: $78$.

(ii). $34\cdot59$. Sum of factors: $93$.

(iii). $17\cdot118$. Sum of factors: $135$.

(iv). $2\cdot1003$. Sum of factors: $1005$.

(v). $1 \cdot 2006$. Sum of factors: $2007$.

In order to obtain the expression:
$a_1\cdot a_2…\cdot a_n = a_1+a_2+…+a_n = 2006$, we only have the factors mentioned in (i)-(v) and the neutral factor $\pm 1$ to fill out with. So, the task is to use a factorization, which involves the fewest number of $1$´es.

Keeping this in mind, the lowest number of factors/terms is obviously obtained, when the sum of factors is largest (case (v).). Consequently, we are aiming for the identity:

$(-1) + 1 + (-1) + 1 + 2006 = (-1) \cdot 1 \cdot (-1) \cdot 1 \cdot 2006$

Hence, the minimum number of factors/terms is $n_{min} = 5$.

P.S.: Case (iv). would imply $n = 1003$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top