MHB Finding Minimum Value of $n$ for Given Sum and Product

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$n\in N,\,\,and \,\, a_1,a_2,a_3,-------,a_n\in Z$
$if \,\, a_+a_2+a_3+-----+a_n=a_1\times a_2\times a_3\times------\times a_n=2006$
$find \,\, min(n)$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My attempt:

The prime factorization of $2006$ is $2\cdot17\cdot59$. This leaves very few possibilities to express $2006$ as a product of integers:(i). $2\cdot17\cdot59$. Sum of factors: $78$.

(ii). $34\cdot59$. Sum of factors: $93$.

(iii). $17\cdot118$. Sum of factors: $135$.

(iv). $2\cdot1003$. Sum of factors: $1005$.

(v). $1 \cdot 2006$. Sum of factors: $2007$.

In order to obtain the expression:
$a_1\cdot a_2…\cdot a_n = a_1+a_2+…+a_n = 2006$, we only have the factors mentioned in (i)-(v) and the neutral factor $\pm 1$ to fill out with. So, the task is to use a factorization, which involves the fewest number of $1$´es.

Keeping this in mind, the lowest number of factors/terms is obviously obtained, when the sum of factors is largest (case (v).). Consequently, we are aiming for the identity:

$(-1) + 1 + (-1) + 1 + 2006 = (-1) \cdot 1 \cdot (-1) \cdot 1 \cdot 2006$

Hence, the minimum number of factors/terms is $n_{min} = 5$.

P.S.: Case (iv). would imply $n = 1003$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top