MHB Finding Notation for Left Invariant Vector Fields on Lie Groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter topsquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
I'm sure this is a trivial notation question. I just can't seem to find the notation in my texts.

Let [math]L_a(g) = ag~\forall a, g \in G[/math] where a is fixed in G and G is a Lie group. (This defines the left action of G on itself.)

A vector field X on a Lie group G is left invariant if
[math](dL_g)(X(x)) = X(L_g(x)) = X(gx)[/math]

I know various differential operators d from Differential Geometry, and I know d acting on two vectors in an affine space, but I can't find any definition of d in Algebra. It's got to be simpler than this.

-Dan

I just looked ahead in my notes. The next topic is a tangent space of G, so maybe d is a differential operation after all. In that case I don't know how to get [math](dL_g)(X(x)) = X(L_g(x))[/math].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I did finally find this and the d is a differential operator.

Here's my problem in detail. Let G be a Lie group. Define [math]L_a(g): G \times G: g \mapsto a \cdot g,~\forall g \in G, \text{ for fixed } a \in G[/math].

Let G be embedded in a smooth manifold M. Then G inherits the differential structure of M. So we have a map [math]dL_a: G \to TG[/math] using this differential structure. In general [math]g \in G[/math] does not lie in TG (Unless perhaps we are taking the tangent space over the identity in G. Not sure on this point.)

Now, a vector field X over a Lie group G is left invariant if
[math](dL_g)X(x) = X(L_g(x)) = X(g \cdot x)[/math]

I would expect a relationship like [math](dL_g)X(x) = X(g \cdot dx)[/math]. Why is there no differential operation on the RHS of the left invariant definition?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Okay, I did finally find this and the d is a differential operator.

Here's my problem in detail. Let G be a Lie group. Define [math]L_a(g): G \times G: g \mapsto a \cdot g,~\forall g \in G, \text{ for fixed } a \in G[/math].

Let G be embedded in a smooth manifold M. Then G inherits the differential structure of M. So we have a map [math]dL_a: G \to TG[/math] using this differential structure. In general [math]g \in G[/math] does not lie in TG (Unless perhaps we are taking the tangent space over the identity in G. Not sure on this point.)

Now, a vector field X over a Lie group G is left invariant if
[math](dL_g)X(x) = X(L_g(x)) = X(g \cdot x)[/math]

I would expect a relationship like [math](dL_g)X(x) = X(g \cdot dx)[/math]. Why is there no differential operation on the RHS of the left invariant definition?

-Dan

Hi Dan,

I'm having some issues with the contents of your question. Why do you embed $G$ in a smooth manifold $M$? The group $G$ is itself a smooth manifold, so it also has a differentiable structure. Also, you're not viewing $d$ correctly. This $d$ is the exterior derivative. Let $f : M \to N$ be a differentiable map between smooth manifolds $M$ and $N$. Then for each $x\in M$, the differential of $f$ at $x$ is a map $df_x : T_x M \to T_{f(x)} N$ such that

$$df_x(\xi):= \frac{d}{dt}|_{t = 0} f(c(t))$$

whenever $\xi \in T_xM$ and $c : [0,1] \to M$ is a curve with $c(0) = x$ and $\dot{c}(0) = \xi$. The total differential of $f$ is a map $df : TM \to TN$ such that $df(x,\xi) := (f(x), df_x(\xi))$ for all $x\in M$ and for all $\xi\in T_xM$.

Since $G$ is a Lie group, the left translation maps $L_g : G \to G$ are diffeomorphisms. So given a vector field $X$ on $G$, the expressions $dL_g X$ makes sense as a vector fields on $G$. The field $X$ is left-invariant if $dL_g X = X$ for all $g\in G$. Let's make sense of this. Let $h\in G$. Then $X_h$ is a vector tangent to $h$ in $G$. Thus for fixed $g$, $dL_g(X_h)$ is a vector tangent to $L_g(h) = gh$ in $G$. So for the equation $dL_g X = X$ to make sense, we must have $dL_g(X_h) = X_{gh}$ for all $h\in G$. Another way of stating this is that $X$ is $L_g$-related to itself.

It's important to note that if $X$ is left-invariant on $G$, then $X$ is completely determined by $X_e$, where $e$ denotes the identity of $G$. For given $g\in G$,

$$ X_g = X_{ge} = dL_g(X_e).$$

Conversely, given a vector $Y_e\in T_eG$, we can form a left-invariant vector field $X$ on $G$ by setting $X_g := dL_g(Y_e)$ for all $g\in G$. By the chain rule, we have

$$ dL_g(X_h) = dL_g(dL_h(Y_e)) = d(L_g \circ L_h)(Y_e) = dL_{gh}(Y_e) = X_{gh}$$

for all $g, h\in G$. So indeed, $X$ is left-invariant. This gives a correspondence between the tangent space to the identity at $G$, $T_eG$, and the space of left-invariant vector fields on $G$, $L(G)$. This correspondence is actually an isomorphism of vector spaces.

Try as an exercise to find all left-invariant vector fields on $\Bbb R$.
 
Euge said:
...
Let $h\in G$. Then $X_h$ is a vector tangent to $h$ in $G$. Thus for fixed $g$, $dL_g(X_h)$ is a vector tangent to $L_g(h) = gh$ in $G$. So for the equation $dL_g X = X$ to make sense, we must have $dL_g(X_h) = X_{gh}$ for all $h\in G$. Another way of stating this is that $X$ is $L_g$-related to itself.
...
In amongst the other material (which organized the facts much better than my stumbling attempts), this statement was exactly what I needed to understand what is going on in the definition. Thank you!

-Dan
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top