MHB Finding Perfect Square Combinations: $m,n\in N$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding natural numbers m and n, where n is less than m, under specific conditions. The constraints include m being between 1000 and 2011, the difference m-n being a power of a prime, and the product m*n being a perfect square. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to identify all suitable values for m and n that satisfy these criteria. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding prime powers and perfect squares in number theory. Ultimately, the goal is to derive a comprehensive list of valid combinations for m and n.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$m,n\in N ,n<m $
given :
$(1)1000\leq m<2011$
$(2) m-n=p^k$ here $p$ is a prime, and $k$$\in\{0,1,2\}$
$(3)m\times n $ is a perfect square number , find all possibe $m$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$m,n\in N ,n<m $
given :
$(1)1000\leq m<2011$
$(2) m-n=p^k$ here $p$ is a prime, and $k$$\in\{0,1,2\}$
$(3)m\times n $ is a perfect square number , find all possibe $m$
k cannot be zero. because

$x(x+1)$ for integer x >0 is between $x^2$ and $(x+1)^2$ and not perfect square
p cannot be 2 because then we have
$x(x+2)= (x+1)^2-1$ not a perfect square
$x(x+4) = (x+2)^2-4$ not a perfect square
so we have p is odd and now for power 1

$m$ and $m-p$ one is odd and another is even and both have to be perfect square
if not then $m = xa^2$ and $n = xb^2$ and $m-n = x(a^2-b^2)$ not a prime unless x = 1
so both are perfect square.
m and m-p have to be square of consecutive numbers else a^2-b^2 = (a-b)(a+b) is not prime
so m is value x then $2x-1$ is prime
$1000 < 32^2$ and $2000 > 44^2$
so we look for 2 * 32-1 to 2 * 44 -1 to be prime.
they are $67(m= 34^2),71(m=36^2), 73(m= 37^2),79(m= 40^2),83(m=44^2)$

now take the case of $p^2$
there are 2 cases
m and n both are consecutive squares
$p^2$ is between 61 and 88
but there is no p

there are 2nd case that is p is factor of m and n
$n = a^2p$ and $m=b^2p$
and $b^2-a^2$ is divisible by p.
we see by checking the value $m=1900$
 
kaliprasad said:
k cannot be zero. because

$x(x+1)$ for integer x >0 is between $x^2$ and $(x+1)^2$ and not perfect square
p cannot be 2 because then we have
$x(x+2)= (x+1)^2-1$ not a perfect square
$x(x+4) = (x+2)^2-4$ not a perfect square
so we have p is odd and now for power 1

$m$ and $m-p$ one is odd and another is even and both have to be perfect square
if not then $m = xa^2$ and $n = xb^2$ and $m-n = x(a^2-b^2)$ not a prime unless x = 1
so both are perfect square.
m and m-p have to be square of consecutive numbers else a^2-b^2 = (a-b)(a+b) is not prime
so m is value x then $2x-1$ is prime
$1000 < 32^2$ and $2000 > 44^2$
so we look for 2 * 32-1 to 2 * 44 -1 to be prime.
they are $67(m= 34^2),71(m=36^2), 73(m= 37^2),79(m= 40^2),83(m=44^2)$

now take the case of $p^2$
there are 2 cases
m and n both are consecutive squares
$p^2$ is between 61 and 88
but there is no p

there are 2nd case that is p is factor of m and n
$n = a^2p$ and $m=b^2p$
and $b^2-a^2$ is divisible by p.
we see by checking the value $m=1900$
m=1156,1296,1369,1600,1764 (k=1)
m=1377,1900 (k=2)
you miss 1377
 
Albert said:
m=1156,1296,1369,1600,1764 (k=1)
m=1377,1900 (k=2)
you miss 1377

right

I missed $1377 = 17 * 81 = 17 * 9^2= 17 * (\frac{17+1}{2})^2$
I got $1900 = 19 * 100 = 19 * (\frac{19+1}{2})^2$

basis for solution
for the case k= 2 we have
$m= pa^2$ and $n=n-p^2= pb^2$
and $a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$ is p so
a-b = 1
a+b = p
or
$m= p(\frac{p+1}{2})^2$
as an estmiate
now m = 1000 gives $p > 15$
m = 2011 given $p < 21$
so p = 17 or 19 and hence the result
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top