Looking for context for a textbook quote

In summary: Are there any linearity rules for finite sums not mentioned in the citation?It would be helpful if you could provide an example or two of where the author discusses a linearity rule that is not mentioned in the citation.
  • #1
mcastillo356
Gold Member
560
267
TL;DR Summary
The motivation of this post is to know a little about the laws of arithmetic and the rules of linearity for finite sums mentioned in the quotation
Hi, PF, there goes the quote from Calculus 7th ed. by Robert A. Adams and Christopher Essex:

"When adding finitely many numbers, the order in which they are added is unimportant; any order will give the same sum. If all the numbers have a common factor, then that factor can be removed from each term and multiplied after the sum is evaluated: ##ca+cb=c(a+b)##. These laws of arithmetic translate into the following linearity rule for finite sums; if ##A## and ##B## are constants, then $$\sum_{i=m}^n\left(Af(i)+Bg(i)\right)=A\sum_{i=m}^n f(i)+B\sum_{i=m}^n g(i)$$
Both of the sums ##\sum^{m+n}_{j=m} f(j)## and ##\sum^{n}_{i=0} f(i+m)## have the same expansion, namely ##f(m)+f(m+1)+\cdots+f(m+n)##. Therefore the two sums are equal, $$\sum_{j=m}^{m+n} f(i)=\sum_{i=0}^{n} f(i+m)$$.
This equality can also be derived by substituting ##i+m## for ##j## everywhere ##j## appears on the left side, noting that ##i+m## reduces to ##i=0##, and ##i+m=m+n## reduces to ##i=n##. It is often convenient to make such a change of index in a summation."

And here the erratic :frown: questions:

1- Which are the laws of arithmetic? A quick search in the Internet is been confusing. Wikipedia is not concrete and doesn't give examples.
2- What stands for linearity in this quote?
3- Are there any linearity rules for finite sums not mentioned in the citation?

Regards, best wishes.

Edited. Reason: To complete the quote
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mcastillo356 said:
∑i=mn(Af(i)+Bg(i))=A∑i=mnf(i)+B∑i=mng(i)
Both of the sums ∑j=mm+nf(j) and ∑i=0nf(i+m) etc...

This is pretty hard to read. Can you ##\TeX## it ?

##\ ##
 
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356
  • #3
Some laws for arithmetic are associative, distributive, commutative and the existence and properties of identities/inverses for addition and multiplication.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356 and topsquark
  • #4
The function f is linear if and only if f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) and if f(ax) = af(x)
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356 and topsquark
  • #5
malawi_glenn said:
The function f is linear if and only if f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) and if f(ax) = af(x)
True, but I would make sure to reference this to the summation operation, specifically, rather than use f(x) as in the OP. It might be confusing.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #6
topsquark said:
True, but I would make sure to reference this to the summation operation, specifically, rather than use f(x) as in the OP. It might be confusing.

-Dan
Feel free to do so
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #7
mcastillo356 said:
1- Which are the laws of arithmetic? A quick search in the Internet is been confusing. Wikipedia is not concrete and doesn't give examples.

The relevant rules here are that addition is commutative [tex]a + b = b + a[/tex] and associative [tex]a + b + c = (a + b) + c = a + (b + c)[/tex] and that multiplication is distributive over addition [tex]a(b+ c) = ab + ac[/tex].

Formally, the real numbers form a field, so under addition they are a commutative group with identity 0 and under multiplication the reals except 0 are a commutative group with identity 1, with multiplication being distributive over addition. Being a group carries with it the requirements that the operation concerned is associative, that there exists a unique identity element, and that each element has a unique inverse. The reals are also ordered in a manner consistent with these operations, so that if [itex]a < b[/itex] then [itex]a + c < b + c[/itex] and if [itex]c > 0[/itex] then [itex]ac < bc[/itex] but if [itex]c < 0[/itex] then [itex]ac > bc[/itex].

2- What stands for linearity in this quote?

A map [itex]S[/itex] between real vector spaces [itex]V[/itex] and [itex]W[/itex] is linear iff [itex]S(f) + S(g) = S(f + g)[/itex] for every pair of vectors [itex]f[/itex] and [itex]g[/itex] and [itex]S(af) = aS(f)[/itex] for every real number [itex]a[/itex] and every vector [itex]f[/itex]. In this case, the set of all sequences of real numbers of a given length can be turned into a vector space under the operations of elementwise addition and scalar multiplication, [tex]
\begin{split}
(f + g)_i &= f_i + g_i \\
(Af)_i &= Af_i. \end{split}
[/tex]Summing the sequence is then a linear map from this space to the real numbers (which are themselves a real vector space): [tex]
\sum_{i=1}^n (Af + Bg)_i = \sum_{i=1}^n (Af_i + Bg_i) =
A \sum_{i=1}^n f_i + B \sum_{i=1}^n g_i.[/tex]
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356 and topsquark
  • #8
To simplify further, if we are dealing with functions y=f(x) the value f spits out when x is plugged in. Since you are dealing with functions of real numbers ( I am assuming, but it also works for n tuples of reals), those f(i) are just numbers. So the usual laws of associativity, commutavity, etc hold when adding a finite number of them. Thing's get tricky when we start adding infinitely many of these numbers together. Since we are not guaranteed that associativity and commutativity hold.

After talking about this, one starts to think of infinite series and convergence

pasmith gave an excellent explanation of a linear map.
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #9
Hi, PF, to better understand everything posted, I've looked for an example to be a little specific about what we discuss.
It is better to separate the thread in two steps, and then join together
(i) Given two vector spaces ##V##, ##W##, a linear mapping ##S:\;V\to W## is a map preserving the following conditions:
##S(v+v')=S(v)+S(v')## (*)
##S(\lambda v)=\lambda S(v)## (**)
(ii) Take the vector space ##V## as the sequence of number of length ##n##; for example length ##n=4##. Vectors would be, for instance,
##f_i=(12,3,4,5)##, that is, ##f_1=12##, ##f_2=3##, ##f_3=4##, ##f_4=5##
and these ##f_i## would be a vector space, because we can sum them, and multiply by scalars:
##f_i=(12,3,4,5)##, ##g_i=(0,-1,4,3)##, ##f_i+g_i=(12+0,3-1,4+4,5+3)=(12,2,8,8)##
##f_i=(12,3,4,5)##, ##\lambda=2##, ##2f_i=(2\cdot 12,2\cdot 3,2\cdot 4,2\cdot 5)=(24,4,16,16)##
Now consider this vector space: ##W=\mathbb{R}##. Then we can consider the function:
##S\;:\;V\rightarrow{\mathbb{R}}##, ##S(f_i)=f_1+f_2+f_3+f_4##, or ##S(f_i)=\sum_{i=1}^n f_i##, e.g. if
##f_i=(12,3,4,5)##, then ##S(f_i)=12+3+4+5=24##
This mapping is a linear map, because it fills (*) and (**) conditions.

Regards, best wishes!
 
  • #10
Corollary:
"In mathematics, and more specifically in linear algebra, a linear map (also called a linear mapping, linear transformation, vector space homomorfism or in some contexts linear function is a mapping ##V\rightarrow{W}## between two vector spaces that preserves the operations of vector addition and scalar multiplication"
Quote from the article "Linear map", Wikipedia
Thanks, PF!
 

What does "context" mean in relation to a textbook quote?

Context refers to the circumstances or background surrounding a particular quote. It includes information about the author, the time period in which the quote was written, and any other relevant details that may help to understand the meaning and significance of the quote.

Why is it important to look for context when analyzing a textbook quote?

Looking for context allows for a deeper understanding of the quote and its relevance to the overall text. It helps to provide a more complete picture of the author's intentions and the historical or cultural context in which the quote was written. Without context, a quote may be misinterpreted or its significance may be lost.

How can I find context for a textbook quote?

There are a few ways to find context for a textbook quote. You can research the author and their background, read about the time period in which the quote was written, and examine the larger themes and ideas present in the text. Additionally, you can consult secondary sources such as scholarly articles or historical documents to gain a better understanding of the context.

What should I look for when analyzing the context of a textbook quote?

When analyzing the context of a textbook quote, it is important to pay attention to the author's background, the historical and cultural context, and any other relevant details that may impact the meaning of the quote. Look for connections between the quote and the larger themes of the text, as well as any potential biases or influences that may have shaped the author's perspective.

How does understanding the context of a textbook quote enhance my understanding of the text?

Understanding the context of a textbook quote allows for a deeper understanding of the text as a whole. It provides insight into the author's intentions and the historical or cultural influences that may have shaped the text. Additionally, it can help to uncover hidden meanings and connections within the text, leading to a more thorough and nuanced analysis.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
693
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
746
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
791
Replies
2
Views
114
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top