Finding Power when no time or velocity are provided?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a man weighing 125kg walking up a 30-degree inclined plane for a distance of 15m. The questions focus on calculating work done, potential energy increase, and horsepower, despite the absence of time or velocity information.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy and question how to relate potential energy to kinetic energy without time or velocity. Some suggest estimating speed or leaving it as a variable.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the problem given the constraints. Some participants express confusion regarding the lack of information needed to calculate power, while others question the validity of using conservation of energy in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of time or velocity in the problem statement, which complicates the calculation of power. There is a recognition that the problem may be poorly posed.

samg1
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A man weighing 125kg walks 15m up to the top of a plane inclined at 30 degree to the horizontal.
find A) Work he has done B) the increase in Potential Energy C) If he wants to go to the top of the plane, what is his horsepower?

Homework Equations


PEo + KEo = PEf + KEf
P = W/T = Fv
1HP = 746 W

The Attempt at a Solution


I found A) and B) which gives 9188 Joules, for the C) part I'm having more difficulty. I thought that by using the law of conservation of energy I could find the initial velocity and then multiply by mg to give the power to then convert the watts to HP. Although, I doubt that this would be it. Any thoughts? Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since HP is a unit of power there's a time component involved. Are you sure that the problem is stated in its entirety? No mention of time or velocity?

If so, the best you can do is either assume that the man walks at a constant speed and make a reasonable estimate of that speed to use in the calculation, or leave the speed as a variable in the answer (i.e. leave the answer in symbolic form).
 
Ok but would it make sense to use the law of conservation of energy?
 
samg1 said:
Ok but would it make sense to use the law of conservation of energy?
Use it how?

While the work the man is doing in climbing the the ramp is being transformed into potential energy, it doesn't tell you anything abut how fast that transformation is being carried out. Energy conservation only tells you part of the story.

Note that the man walking up the ramp implies a constant speed, so there's no net change in kinetic energy taking place.
 
I would have used it this way:
We know that the potential energy is 0 at the beginning and that at the end of the motion it is 9188 joules. Therefore, by using the law of conservation of energy I would equal the initial kinetic energy to the final potential energy like this -> KEo = PEf -> 1/2mv^2 = 9188 J -> v = sqrt( 2m9188) ?

Thanks for your help by the way, I'm just very puzzled with this question considering that I have no information about time or velocity to find the power.
 
samg1 said:
I would have used it this way:
We know that the potential energy is 0 at the beginning and that at the end of the motion it is 9188 joules. Therefore, by using the law of conservation of energy I would equal the initial kinetic energy to the final potential energy like this -> KEo = PEf -> 1/2mv^2 = 9188 J -> v = sqrt( 2m9188) ?
I think you mean v = sqrt(2 ⋅ 9188 / m), if m is the mass. But no, that won't work since the mass is not sliding or rolling up the hill and changing its KE. There is no change in velocity taking place, no net trade between KE and PE.
Thanks for your help by the way, I'm just very puzzled with this question considering that I have no information about time or velocity to find the power.
Yup, that is a puzzler. Perhaps the question is badly posed. It happens sometimes.
 
gneill said:
I think you mean v = sqrt(2 ⋅ 9188 / m), if m is the mass. But no, that won't work since the mass is not sliding or rolling up the hill and changing its KE. There is no change in velocity taking place, no net trade between KE and PE.
Ok thanks for your time !
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K