Finding Solutions for x^3 + (1/x^3) ≥ 3

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the inequality x^3 + (1/x^3) ≥ 3, focusing on algebraic manipulation, polynomial roots, and the application of the fundamental theorem of algebra and Descartes' rule of signs. Participants explore various approaches to simplify the expression and identify critical points.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests moving all terms to the left-hand side and combining them into a rational expression.
  • Another participant rewrites the inequality as x^6 - 3x^3 + 1 ≥ 0 and expresses uncertainty about the next steps.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of not multiplying an inequality by an expression with an unknown sign.
  • Discussion includes the application of the fundamental theorem of algebra, which states that a polynomial of degree n will have exactly n roots, counting multiplicity.
  • Participants discuss the use of Descartes' rule of signs to determine the nature of the roots of the polynomial.
  • One participant points out that the expression (x^3)^2 - 3x^3 + 1 cannot be factored and suggests using the quadratic formula to find roots.
  • Another participant calculates the approximate values of critical points using a calculator and discusses testing intervals around these points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the application of polynomial root-finding techniques and the implications of Descartes' rule of signs. There is no consensus on the final solution, as participants are still exploring the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about specific mathematical concepts, such as the fundamental theorem of algebra and Descartes' rule of signs, indicating a potential gap in knowledge that may affect their reasoning.

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Section 2.6
Question 82

Solve: x^3 + (1/x^3) ≥ 3. (Use a calculator to approximate the key numbers.)

I need someone to get me started.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Move everything to the LHS, and then combine all terms into a rational expression...what do you then have?
 
x^3 + (1/x^3) - 3 ≥ 0

x^3(x^3) + [(1/x^3)](x^3)/1 -3x^3 ≥ 0

x^6 + 1 - 3x^3 ≥ 0

x^6 - 3x^3 + 1 ≥ 0

I am stuck here.
 
What you should have is:

$$\frac{x^6-3x^3+1}{x^3}\ge0$$

Recall, you don't want to multiply an inequality by an expression having an unknown sign.

We have a 6th degree polynomial in the numerator, and so the fundamental theorem of algebra tells us that we should expect to find 6 roots...what does Descartes' rule of signs tell us about these roots? Do you recognize that you can treat the numerator like a quadratic?
 
"Recall, you don't want to multiply an inequality by an expression having an unknown sign."

Yes, I forgot that important rule.

"We have a 6th degree polynomial in the numerator, and so the fundamental theorem of algebra tells us that we should expect to find 6 roots."

What is the Fund. Theo. of Algebra?"What does Descartes' rule of signs tell us about these roots?"

I am not there in the textbook and thus, do not know this rule.

"Do you recognize that you can treat the numerator like a quadratic?"

Can the numerator by written as (x^2)^3 - 3x^3 + 1?
 
RTCNTC said:
"Recall, you don't want to multiply an inequality by an expression having an unknown sign."

Yes, I forgot that important rule.

"We have a 6th degree polynomial in the numerator, and so the fundamental theorem of algebra tells us that we should expect to find 6 roots."

What is the Fund. Theo. of Algebra?

One of the proven assertions of the FTOA is:

A polynomial of degree n will have exactly n roots (counting multiplicity).

RTCNTC said:
"What does Descartes' rule of signs tell us about these roots?"

I am not there in the textbook and thus, do not know this rule.

That's why I provided a link...it is a useful rule when studying polynomials, and its usage is within the grasp of the Pre-Calc student. I advise you to read the information to which I linked, and let me know what this rule says about the roots of the polynomial under consideration here.

RTCNTC said:
"Do you recognize that you can treat the numerator like a quadratic?"

Can the numerator by written as (x^2)^3 - 3x^3 + 1?

No, this is what I mean:

$$(x^3)^2-3x^3+1$$

We have a quadratic in $x^3$. This will give you two of the roots, and you should be able to use Descartes' rule of signs to determine if there are any other real roots. :D
 
The expression (x^3)^2 - 3x^3 + 1 cannot be factored.
 
RTCNTC said:
The expression (x^3)^2 - 3x^3 + 1 cannot be factored.

It has no rational roots, but we can use the quadratic formula to state:

$$x^3=\frac{3\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}\implies x=\sqrt[3]{\frac{3\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}}$$

Descartes' rule of signs indicates that the remaining roots must be complex, and so these two real roots are all we need to be concerned about. So, you have 3 critical values, all of which are roots of odd multiplicity, so you know what to do from here. :D
 
Thanks. I will need to use my calculator. The critical values are complicated. They belong on the number line and the rest remains the same steps, right?
 
  • #10
Let CR = CUBE ROOT

Let SR = SQUARE ROOTCR{(3 - SR{5})/2} = x which is about 0.7256

CR{(3 + SR{5})/2} = x which is about 1.378

<----------(0.7256)----------(1.378)----------->

For (-infinity, 0.7256), let x = 0. True statement.

For (0.7256, 1.378), let x = 1.2. False statement.

For (1.378, infinity), let x = 4. True statement.

We exclude the critical points.

Solution:

(-infinity, 0.7256) U (1.378, infinity)

Correct?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K